1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01418132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coulomb potentials and the energy-angular momentum balance in heavy ion transfer reactions

Abstract: Coulomb terms in optical model parameters and in the effective interaction are discussed for DWBA in charged particle transfer in heavy ion reactions. It is shown that certain discrepancies in shapes of calculated angular distributions are due to incorrect treatment of Coulomb terms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2c). This discrepancy is generally observed in heavy ion transfer with charge transfer [26]. As discussed in [26] the dominant reason for this is the large change in the Coulomb interaction if charge is transfered from a light to a heavy nucleus (or vice versa).…”
Section: Ls Interaction Is Includedmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2c). This discrepancy is generally observed in heavy ion transfer with charge transfer [26]. As discussed in [26] the dominant reason for this is the large change in the Coulomb interaction if charge is transfered from a light to a heavy nucleus (or vice versa).…”
Section: Ls Interaction Is Includedmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This discrepancy is generally observed in heavy ion transfer with charge transfer [26]. As discussed in [26] the dominant reason for this is the large change in the Coulomb interaction if charge is transfered from a light to a heavy nucleus (or vice versa). This reflects itself in the distorted waves of the final channel, for which, however, generally the asymptotic charge procuct is used, in our case (Z e +1)(Zr-1)=5 x 55.…”
Section: Ls Interaction Is Includedmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the po- Table 1, and Qo = -7.8 MeV tential parameters of [11] a reasonable overall agreement is achieved between FRDWBA calculations and the data. However, as observed in all charged particle transfer reactions, the position of the grazing maximum is not correctly reproduced [19]. The effect is most likely due to the strong perturbation introduced by the change of the Coulomb interaction.…”
Section: Angular Distributions and Reaction Asymmetries For (Lzcmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The sensitivity of the DWBA calculations on the cancellation V~-Vv~O depends on the optical model parameters used. The weaker the real (and the imaginary) part of the optical model potential the stronger< is the effect of the cancellation ~-VF=0 [19]. In these cases the difference A V can be a large fraction of the scattering potentials.…”
Section: B) Angular Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 97%