“…The greatest portion of the ethics literature consists of position papers by scholars discussing five major issues: (a) the functions and limitations of ethical codes as guidelines for behavior (Beck, 1971;Bersoff, 1975;Losito, 1980;Zemlick, 1980); (b) the sensitive relationship between values and ethics (Ajzen, 1973;Beutler, 1978;Buhler, 1962;Maguire, 1978;Nordberg, 1979;Smith & Peterson, 1977;Sullivan, 1976;Weisskopf-Joelson, 1980;Wolfe, 1978); (c) the impact of recent professional developments on standards for professional conduct (Arderton, Staulcup & Grisso, 1980;Beck, 1971: Godwin & Bode, 1971Roston, 1975;Smith, 1981;Ware, 1971); (d) special ethical considerations when working with particular populations of clients (Angelone, 1979;Long, 1981;Meredith & Reister, 1980;Onoda, 1978;Page, 1979) or when using particular counseling strategies (Begelman, 1975;Hines & Hare-Mustin, 1978;Kitchener, 1980;Stolz, 1978); and (e) the relationship of moral philosophy to professional ethics (Golightly, 1971;Losito, 1980;Sullivan, 1976;Van Hoose & Kottler, 1977). In essence, most of these scholars are calling for a more sophisticated approach to ethics.…”