1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01408411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counseling families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: A psychosocial perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have looked at the provision of information during genetic consultations1 and counsellees' expectations before attending cancer family history clinics 2. Using data obtained during a prospective study of genetic counselling for breast or ovarian cancer,3 we present suggestions for the use of written information by family history clinics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have looked at the provision of information during genetic consultations1 and counsellees' expectations before attending cancer family history clinics 2. Using data obtained during a prospective study of genetic counselling for breast or ovarian cancer,3 we present suggestions for the use of written information by family history clinics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their expectations of the familial breast cancer clinic may include provision of breast screening, genetic risk information, or simply reassurance. It has been suggested that women may be more interested in obtaining reassurance and information about cancer detection and prevention than in procuring genetic risk information or genetic testing,14 15 though there is likely to be wide variety in their reasons for attending. To our knowledge, no published research to date has examined whether there is variance in the psychosocial characteristics of women who are attending the familial breast cancer clinic for different reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boersma et al, 2007; gave us reason to believe that Deleted: Table 3 Deleted: This study, as some extracurricular developments, aim to introduce more contemporary concepts and genomics research techniques in school biology (Dougherty, 2009;Mil, Boerwinkel, Buizer-Voskamp, Speksnijder, & Waarlo, 2010). However, most of the concepts mentioned do not form a part of the formal curriculum, and also exceed some earlier recommendations that were limited to the more classical Mendelian concepts (Richards et al, 1995). This might be an important side effect.…”
Section: The Story Of Annementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Other authors suggest the introduction of NOS aspects such as collecting and interpreting data or the uncertainty of scientific information (Ryder, 2001). Although the number of publications on teaching genetics in this controversial genetic test practice is substantial, the majority of the work focuses on higher education (Challen, Hallowel, Green, Murton, & Statham, 1995). For high school teachers, the relevant knowledge for teaching genetics in context is still to be explored.…”
Section: Needs For Expanding the Curriculum On Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%