2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00095.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counselors’ Knowledge of the Adoption of Tobacco Cessation Medications in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Abstract: This study assessed counselors’ knowledge of the adoption of evidence-based tobacco cessation medications (TCMs) - varenicline, bupropion, and five nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) - and predictors of adoption in diverse substance abuse treatment settings. We used MERITS I data from 658 counselors working in 26 programs. Adoption of varenicline was reported by 16% of counselors, bupropion by 11%, and NRTs by 27%. Knowledge of the adoption of all types of TCMs was more likely to be reported by counselors w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to previous research on the adoption of diverse TCS in SUD treatment programs (e.g., Eby & Laschober, 2013; Friedmann et al, 2008; Guydish et al, 2012; Knudsen & Studts, 2010; Knudsen et al, 2012; Rothrauff & Eby, 2010). Thus, although low-income patients may not be at a particular disadvantage in terms of access to TCS in general compared to other patients, they may not have extensive access to the full range of EBTs to aid their TC attempts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are similar to previous research on the adoption of diverse TCS in SUD treatment programs (e.g., Eby & Laschober, 2013; Friedmann et al, 2008; Guydish et al, 2012; Knudsen & Studts, 2010; Knudsen et al, 2012; Rothrauff & Eby, 2010). Thus, although low-income patients may not be at a particular disadvantage in terms of access to TCS in general compared to other patients, they may not have extensive access to the full range of EBTs to aid their TC attempts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In fact, TC treatment is positively associated with greater abstinence from alcohol and other drugs, decreased risk of alcohol and drug relapse, and decreased alcohol consumption (Baca & Yahne, 2009; Barrett, Tichauer, Leyton, & Pihl, 2006; Prochaska, Delucchi, & Hall, 2004; Satre, Kohn, & Weisner, 2007; Weinberger & Sofuoglu, 2009). However, TCS are not extensively adopted in treatment programs (Eby & Laschober, 2013; Friedmann, Jian, & Richter, 2008; Guydish et al, 2012; Knudsen & Studts, 2010; Knudsen, Studts, & Studts, 2012; Rothrauff & Eby, 2010), which may hamper access to EBTs among low-income smokers.…”
Section: Demand For Tobacco Cessation Services Among Low-income Sud Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,3033 This is understandable because the FDA does not currently approve TC pharmacotherapy with adolescents. 9 The especially low implementation of pharmacotherapy may also suggest that because counselors are generally not allowed to prescribe pharmacotherapy they may not be comfortable using physician prescribed medications with adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because many patients need help to quit smoking (Tobacco Use Recovery Now!, 2009), SUD treatment programs are prime settings for providing evidence-based tobacco cessation services (TCS) recommended by national guidelines including counseling and pharmacotherapy (Fiore et al, 2008). Given the generally low adoption of TCS in SUD treatment programs (Friedmann, Jiang, & Richter, 2008; Knudsen & Studts, 2011; Muilenburg, Laschober, & Eby, 2014a,b; Rothrauff & Eby, 2011), the current study longitudinally examines SUD program administrator reports of TC counseling and TC pharmacotherapy adoption patterns (sustained, new, never, and discontinued), as these are necessary conditions for implementation patterns, and their program-level predictors to better understand the adoption process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%