2019
DOI: 10.11152/mu-1930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Count of B-lines: a reappraisal. Comment on “Visual versus automatic ultrasound scoring of lung B-lines: reliability and consistency between systems”

Abstract: .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next steps for a wider applicability of LUS in the assessment of SSc-ILD are represented by technique standardisation (definition of the findings to be used, protocols of image acquisition and quantification of findings) and other ‘clinical’ needs (validation in early stages of the disease; evaluation of the optimal timing for diagnosis and follow-up; and minimal significant detectable change). Finally, promising results have been shown in ILD patients (including also SSc) for automatization of the scan evaluation 65,66 and of B-lines quantification. 67…”
Section: Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next steps for a wider applicability of LUS in the assessment of SSc-ILD are represented by technique standardisation (definition of the findings to be used, protocols of image acquisition and quantification of findings) and other ‘clinical’ needs (validation in early stages of the disease; evaluation of the optimal timing for diagnosis and follow-up; and minimal significant detectable change). Finally, promising results have been shown in ILD patients (including also SSc) for automatization of the scan evaluation 65,66 and of B-lines quantification. 67…”
Section: Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%