1974
DOI: 10.5636/jgg.26.487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counter-clockwise motion of paleomagnetic directions 24000 years ago at Mono Lake, California.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength ratio falls in the range suggested by DENHAM (1974) for the source of the Mono Lake excursion, 24,000 years ago namely, p=0.12 to 0.21. Also it is somewhat greater than the absolute minimum value given in the finely tuned model of HARRISON and RAMIREZ (1975) for the Laschamp event (ps=-0.113).…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strength ratio falls in the range suggested by DENHAM (1974) for the source of the Mono Lake excursion, 24,000 years ago namely, p=0.12 to 0.21. Also it is somewhat greater than the absolute minimum value given in the finely tuned model of HARRISON and RAMIREZ (1975) for the Laschamp event (ps=-0.113).…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 94%
“…according to DENHAM (1974) could have been produced by a source at about 230 geographic latitude drifting eastward with a positive ps. The geomagnetic latitude of the source would have a middle or low value depending on the orientation of the main dipole at the time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the Mono Lake study became well known because of a large amplitude departur e of declination from true north to about 120~ accompanied by abnormally high inclinations reaching nearly 90 ~ (down) as compared with the overall average value of about 55 ~ and the ADF value of 57 ~ This feature became known as the 'Mono Lake Excursion': its age was estimated to have run from 24 600 to 24 000 bp, during which time the NRM vector rotated in a counter-clockwise sense (with advancing time). Denham (1974) later observed the same phenomenon at another site which he correlated with the first site (Verosub, 1977); LAHONTAN = Lake Lahontan (Liddicoat, 1976); PYRAMID = Lake Pyramid (Verosub et al, 1980); MONODC and MONOL ---Mono Lake (Denham andCox 1971 andLiddicoat, 1976 respectively); BONNEVILLE = Lake Bonneville (Liddicoat, 1976). Timescale in thousands of years before present.…”
Section: Mono Lake Excursionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was largely because radiocarbon did not provide an K.M.CREER , 1936); E = Lake Erie (Creer et al, 1976a); H = Lake Huron (Mothersill, 1981); M = Lake Michigan (Creer et al, 1976b;Vitorello and Van der Voo, 1977;Dodson et al, 1977); S = Lake Superior (Mothersill, 1979); K = Kylen Lake and SC = St. Croix Lake (Lund andBanerjee, 1979, 1983;Lund, 1981); A = Anderson's Pond (Lund, 1981;Lund and Banerjee, 1983); Bv = Lake Bonneville, Lh = Lake Lahontan (Liddicoat, 1976); Py = Pyramid Lake (Verosub et. al., 1980); Mo = Mono Lake (Denham and Cox, 1971;Denham, 1974;Liddicoat, 1976;Liddicoat and Coe, 1979); CI = Clear Lake (Verosub, 1977); Sp = speleothems (Latham et al, 1982); B = Bessette Creek (Turner et al, 1983).…”
Section: Great Lakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High deposition rate sedimentary environments offer the best resolution availablè, as shown by paleomagnetic work on present day lacustrine sediments (Thompson, 1975;Creer, 1977), dry lake beds (Denham and Cox, 1971;Denham, 1974;Liddicoat and Coe, 1979), and marine sediments (Opdyke et al, 1972).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%