2018
DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqy029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counter-messages as Prevention or Promotion of Extremism?! The Potential Role of YouTube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
63
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, these methods cannot reliably distinguish between facts and opinions, nor can they detect irony, humour or sarcasm 56 . They also have difficulty differentiating between extremist content and counter-extremist messages 57 , because both types of messages tend to be tagged with similar keywords. A more general shortcoming of current endogenous cues of epistemic quality is that their evaluation requires background knowledge of the issue in question, which often makes them non-transparent and potentially prone to abuse for censorship purposes.…”
Section: Digital Cues and Behavioural Interventions For Human-centredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, these methods cannot reliably distinguish between facts and opinions, nor can they detect irony, humour or sarcasm 56 . They also have difficulty differentiating between extremist content and counter-extremist messages 57 , because both types of messages tend to be tagged with similar keywords. A more general shortcoming of current endogenous cues of epistemic quality is that their evaluation requires background knowledge of the issue in question, which often makes them non-transparent and potentially prone to abuse for censorship purposes.…”
Section: Digital Cues and Behavioural Interventions For Human-centredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included among general content creators are those who specifically target users with polarizing and radicalizing political content. While YouTube and other social media platforms have generally taken a strict stance against most inflammatory material on their platform, extremist groups from jihadi terrorist organizations [18] [19], various political positions [20], and conspiracy theorists have nonetheless been able to permeate the content barrier [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One key focus of recent critiques of YouTube has been its recommendation engine (Regner, 2014;Schmitt et al, 2018;Ribeiro et al, 2020). The design of the recommendation system is central to YouTube's user experience for two reasons.…”
Section: Platform Analysis: Youtubementioning
confidence: 99%