2021
DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2021.1989387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counter-terrorism and the repression of Islamic activism: Hizb ut-Tahrir in Britain and Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst approaches to tackling VRWE content have a relatively long history, the content frames and linkages have continued to shift over time, significantly changing policy and language both in their scope and their focus—partly as a result of slippage around the problematic language of violent extremism (McNeil‐Willson, 2023; Sedgwick, 2010). For instance, several scholars have suggested that current trends within the language of violent extremism and counter‐extremism policy (Onursal & Kirkpatrick, 2021) represent a crisis of counterterrorism (Jackson, 2015), by which an expanding ‘securitising lens’ highlights the failure of policy to adequately prevent or account for irregular violence (McNeil‐Willson, 2019). This has led to an increasingly unwieldy set of language and concepts within the counterterror paradigm, to include events far beyond what was traditionally termed as terrorism—such as misinformation linked to the COVID‐19 pandemic, polarisation, so‐called antigovernmental or antisystem extremism, along with several kinds of activism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst approaches to tackling VRWE content have a relatively long history, the content frames and linkages have continued to shift over time, significantly changing policy and language both in their scope and their focus—partly as a result of slippage around the problematic language of violent extremism (McNeil‐Willson, 2023; Sedgwick, 2010). For instance, several scholars have suggested that current trends within the language of violent extremism and counter‐extremism policy (Onursal & Kirkpatrick, 2021) represent a crisis of counterterrorism (Jackson, 2015), by which an expanding ‘securitising lens’ highlights the failure of policy to adequately prevent or account for irregular violence (McNeil‐Willson, 2019). This has led to an increasingly unwieldy set of language and concepts within the counterterror paradigm, to include events far beyond what was traditionally termed as terrorism—such as misinformation linked to the COVID‐19 pandemic, polarisation, so‐called antigovernmental or antisystem extremism, along with several kinds of activism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the challenges, securitisation theory is particularly relevant in this case because of its focus on language. In examining how online content becomes securitised, we not only focus specifically on language as the means by which security is created, we also see language as potentially being a receptor of, or negatively impacted by, this security—language and content itself becoming a new ‘threat’ from a growing securitised lens (McNeil‐Willson, 2019). The paper also updates existing scholarship on European securitisation processes, by moving beyond language of securitisation being used to target migrant or ‘other’ communities, towards language from White majorities, linked to VRWE.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel has developed within, and as part of, the broader Prevent programme in the UK, which has become the main focus of British counterterrorism practice (Kaleem, 2021;McNeil-Willson, 2019). It has been implemented across UK society, with legal obligations to locate extremism enshrined within the UK public sector (Busher, Choudhury, Thomas, & Harris, 2017).…”
Section: The Development Of Channel Within the Prevent Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…З другого боку, певний резонанс викликала тема поширення ХТ в декількох західних країнах, зокрема в Данії та Німеччині, де члени організації відзначилися контраверсійними заявами та публічними акціями [Möller et al 2021;Simonsen 2014]. Насамперед, однак, це стосується Великобританії, яка стала глобальним центром медіаактивності організації [Genovese 2012;Hamid 2007;Maher 2016;McNeil-Willson 2021;Orofino 2015;Orofino 2021a;Salama 2021;Stuart and Ahmed 2010;Sinclair 2010;Sinclair 2018;Wali 2017]. Особливо ж треба виокремити повноцінні монографічні дослідження процесів ректрутування нових членів, а також причин привабливості ХТ для мусульман Великобританії та Австралії, запропоновані Валі [Wali 2016] та Орофіно [Orofino 2020].…”
unclassified