2010
DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2010.9711939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Countercurrent Gas-Liquid Flow in a PWR Hot Leg under Reflux Cooling (II) Numerical Simulation of 1/15-Scale Air-Water Tests

Abstract: When reflux cooling is executed in the case of loss of residual heat removal systems under mid-loop operation of PWR, steam generated in the reactor core and water condensed in the steam generator may form a complicated countercurrent flow in the hot leg. Numerical simulations of air-water countercurrent flows in a 1/15-scale model of the hot leg are carried out in this study to examine the capability of predicting two-phase flow patterns and CCFL characteristics in the hot leg. A three-dimensional two-fluid m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows a comparison of the predicted CCFL characteristics with the measured data. 11) As previously reported, 12) model without the expansion) were in excellent agreement with the measured CCFL characteristics including the hysteresis. In the simulations of the expanding pipe, the CCFL did not occur at the upper end of the inclined pipe, and the CCFL in the horizontal pipe occurred at a higher J G than that in the case of no expansion.…”
Section: Computational Gridsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 9 shows a comparison of the predicted CCFL characteristics with the measured data. 11) As previously reported, 12) model without the expansion) were in excellent agreement with the measured CCFL characteristics including the hysteresis. In the simulations of the expanding pipe, the CCFL did not occur at the upper end of the inclined pipe, and the CCFL in the horizontal pipe occurred at a higher J G than that in the case of no expansion.…”
Section: Computational Gridsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…(3)- (8) was confirmed for the 1/15 th scale tests. 12) In the validation, the hysteresis in the flow pattern was successfully simulated and the predicted CCFL characteristics agreed well with the measured data. In the tests and simulations, however, the expansion of the inclined pipe in a real PWR hot leg was not simulated.…”
Section: Gas-liquid Interfacial Friction Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…(4)- (9) was confirmed for the 1/15 th scale air-water experiments. (12) In the validation, the hysteresis in the flow pattern was successfully simulated and the predicted CCFL characteristics agreed well with the measured data. The problem which must be dealt with is whether the interfacial drag coefficients, Eqs.…”
Section: Interfacial Drag Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Previously, three-dimensional two-fluid model simulations were used to reproduce the observed flow patterns and CCFL characteristics for air/water experiments with the 1/15 th scale model. (12) However, the applicability of the method, especially of the interfacial drag coefficients to CCFL, requires further validation for a wide range of fluid properties. Numerical simulations for the above experiments were therefore conducted.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One was a 1/5th scale rectangular duct (Minami et al, 2008a), and the other was a 1/15th scale circular pipe (Minami et al, 2010a). Then we carried out numerical simulations of these small scale experiments to investigate flow pattern and CCFL characteristics (Minami et al, 2008b and2010b). We used a three-dimensional two-fluid model to evaluate the capability of predicting countercurrent flow in the hot leg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%