1990
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(90)80105-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Countercurrent two-phase flow fixed bed catalytic reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution of theses equations was not available with conventional methods such as "shooting" method or finite differences. Instead, the "double alternate integration" method was found most reliable (Trambouze, 1990). …”
Section: Reactor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solution of theses equations was not available with conventional methods such as "shooting" method or finite differences. Instead, the "double alternate integration" method was found most reliable (Trambouze, 1990). …”
Section: Reactor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is therefore necessary to proceed the HDS reaction under H 2 S concentration as low as possible, and it is needed to remove the produced H 2 S from the reacting system efficiently. In this context, a countercurrent flow reactor is the ideal choice in principle, as was presented by Trambouze in 1990. Therefore, countercurrent operation is an advanced technology in HDS, and this technology has been patented by ABB Lummus Crest Inc. (Relly and Hamilton, 1993) and in commercialization for over 20 years (Reilly et al, 1973;Jackson, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reaction temperature was monitored with a K-type thermocouple axially located in the center of the catalyst bed. Previous catalytic experiments were performed to select the operation conditions that ensure chemical reaction control [36][37][38]. In order to satisfy these conditions, a flow of 170mLmin -1 of a CH 4 , O 2 and N 2 mixture was fed to a fixed-bed reactor containing 52mg of catalyst dissolved in 552mg of inert phase (catalyst/inert ratio=1/10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies were published in the last two decades about the advantages an disadvantages of using cocurrent and counter-current cooling configurations, Soria Lopez et al (1981), de Lasa (1983, Hosten and Froment (1986) studied the fully co-current operation and Luss and Medellin (1972), Akella and Lee (1983), Guirardello (1988) and Trambouze (1990) the fully counter-current operation. Finally, McGreavy and Dunbobbin (1978), Ravella (1987) and Borio et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%