2005
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterfactual and Semifactual Conditionals Prime Alternative Possibilities.

Abstract: The authors examined in 3 experiments the comprehension of counterfactuals, such as "If it had rained, the plants would have bloomed," and semifactuals, such as "Even if it had rained, the plants would have bloomed," compared with indicative conditionals, "If it rained, the plants bloomed." The first experiment showed that people read the negative conjunction, "not p and not q" faster when it was primed by a counterfactual than when it was primed by an indicative conditional. They read the affirmative conjunct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
74
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, within the mental model theory of conditionals, Santamaria, Espino & Byrne (2005), show that a counterfactual conditional statement primes both factual and counterfactual possibilities whereas a factual conditional primes only the real-world possibility. The effects reported here, where RW-inconsistent information takes longer to process than CW-inconsistent information, support the idea that both possibilities are primed by a counterfactual context while only one is primed by a factual conditional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, within the mental model theory of conditionals, Santamaria, Espino & Byrne (2005), show that a counterfactual conditional statement primes both factual and counterfactual possibilities whereas a factual conditional primes only the real-world possibility. The effects reported here, where RW-inconsistent information takes longer to process than CW-inconsistent information, support the idea that both possibilities are primed by a counterfactual context while only one is primed by a factual conditional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. '';Ferguson, 2012) suggest that readers do make factual inferences from counterfactuals (i.e., that it had not rained that morning and Susan had not rushed to work) yet maintain access to both counterfactual and factual interpretations (as evidenced by anomaly detection responses for counterfactual conditions compared to a factually consistent condition; see also de Vega et al, 2007;Santamaria, Espino, & Byrne, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study we use a comprehension task to infer what kind of possibilities people keep in mind when they understand conditional sentences. We make use of a priming methodology (see Santamaría & Espino, 2002;Santamaría, Espino, & Byrne, 2005) to find out what kinds of mental representations people have in mind when they read different conditionals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%