2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.14292
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterfactual Ghost Imaging

Jonte Hance,
John Rarity

Abstract: We give a protocol for ghost imaging in a way that is always counterfactual -while imaging an object, no light interacts with that object. This extends the idea of counterfactuality beyond communication, showing how this interesting phenomenon can be leveraged for metrology. Given, in the infinite limit, no photons ever go to the imaged object, it presents a method of imaging even the most light-sensitive of objects without damaging them. Even when not in the infinite limit, it still provides a many-fold impro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlike quantum 'probability amplitudes', which are really quasiprobabilities -they can be negative or even imaginary, and so can interfere destructively with one another. This negative probability interference is a key part of quantum mechanics, explaining peculiar phenomena such as the sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment [33], the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Detector [34], and counterfactual communication [35,36] and imaging [37]. It is unclear how the real non-negative probabilities of this real underlying state-of-the-world could replicate these effects -casting doubt on this framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlike quantum 'probability amplitudes', which are really quasiprobabilities -they can be negative or even imaginary, and so can interfere destructively with one another. This negative probability interference is a key part of quantum mechanics, explaining peculiar phenomena such as the sequential Stern-Gerlach experiment [33], the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Detector [34], and counterfactual communication [35,36] and imaging [37]. It is unclear how the real non-negative probabilities of this real underlying state-of-the-world could replicate these effects -casting doubt on this framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%