Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Various species conservation paradigms are facing enormous challenges during the ongoing Anthropocene. While the widely-used reintroduction/translocation-based approaches have supported many endangered species population recoveries, they seldom use detailed genetic information during initial planning. The Indian greater one-horned rhino typifies such assisted migration-driven species recovery, but currently facing long-term survival concerns due to their mostly small, isolated populations reaching respective carrying capacities. We assessed nation-wide rhino genetic health, identified suitable source populations and provided future translocation scenarios for all extant and proposed rhino habitats. Analyses with 504 unique rhino genotypes across all seven Indian rhino-bearing parks revealed six genetically-isolated populations with overall moderately low genetic diversity. Our results showed that Kaziranga and Manas NPs (Assam) to have the best rhino genetic health, whereas Jaldapara and Gorumara NPs (West Bengal) undergoing strong genetic erosions. Forward genetic simulations suggested that annual supplementation efforts from only few Assam rhino populations (Kaziranga NP, Orang NP and Pobitora WLS) are best suited for genetic rescue of most of the extant populations. Overall, the genetic diversity and differentiation patterns mimics the complex evolutionary history and individual recovery histories. We suggest park-specific management solutions (ranging from protection measures, grassland restoration, livestock and conflict management, regular supplementation events etc.) to ensure the species’ long-term persistence and prevent the alarming loss of grassland habitats and its associate biodiversity. We insist on utilising such genetic health indices-driven population management solutions to identify targeted mitigative measures in other species.
Various species conservation paradigms are facing enormous challenges during the ongoing Anthropocene. While the widely-used reintroduction/translocation-based approaches have supported many endangered species population recoveries, they seldom use detailed genetic information during initial planning. The Indian greater one-horned rhino typifies such assisted migration-driven species recovery, but currently facing long-term survival concerns due to their mostly small, isolated populations reaching respective carrying capacities. We assessed nation-wide rhino genetic health, identified suitable source populations and provided future translocation scenarios for all extant and proposed rhino habitats. Analyses with 504 unique rhino genotypes across all seven Indian rhino-bearing parks revealed six genetically-isolated populations with overall moderately low genetic diversity. Our results showed that Kaziranga and Manas NPs (Assam) to have the best rhino genetic health, whereas Jaldapara and Gorumara NPs (West Bengal) undergoing strong genetic erosions. Forward genetic simulations suggested that annual supplementation efforts from only few Assam rhino populations (Kaziranga NP, Orang NP and Pobitora WLS) are best suited for genetic rescue of most of the extant populations. Overall, the genetic diversity and differentiation patterns mimics the complex evolutionary history and individual recovery histories. We suggest park-specific management solutions (ranging from protection measures, grassland restoration, livestock and conflict management, regular supplementation events etc.) to ensure the species’ long-term persistence and prevent the alarming loss of grassland habitats and its associate biodiversity. We insist on utilising such genetic health indices-driven population management solutions to identify targeted mitigative measures in other species.
A species is expected to be most resilient to environmental change when it occurs across a broad diversity of habitats. However, there is often no visual representation of the past (i.e. prehistoric and historical) context for a species in the range maps published by national and global authorities. Therefore, it is easy to overlook the fact that many species once occupied a broader geographic range, or greater diversity of habitats. Such oversights hinder the effective conservation of species that have become restricted to a subset of their formerly occupied habitats. Here, we quantified the shifted baseline that may underpin some of the ecological misconceptions about species, and developed a rapid assessment method to aid the identification and prioritisation of ‘potential refugee species' (i.e. species that have become restricted to a subset of their formerly occupied niche). The assessment of potential refugee status is different from, but complementary to, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List and Green Status frameworks. Our framework defines a continuum of potential refugee status, which was demonstratable in continent‐scale maps drawn from biogeographic regionalisation. Applying this framework to all native rodent species across the continent of Australia (a group that has suffered several extinctions and notable declines), we found that the risk of ecological misconceptions caused by shifted baselines (i.e. resulting from ‘shifting baseline syndrome') was prevalent. This suggests that in many cases, translocation opportunities that might be avoided because they are perceived as conservation introductions (as defined by the IUCN translocation guidelines), may in fact fall within the indigenous range, and should therefore be considered reasonable reintroductions. Ultimately, our potential refugee assessment framework will help to facilitate the undertaking of ambitious translocations that will build species' resilience to environmental change by resuming their adaptation to habitats across all formerly occupied bioregions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.