Countering the Covid-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. A Successful Securitization in an Environment of Low Political Trust.

Abstract

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, authorities around the world securitized the virus and enforced unprecedented tactics. A successful securitization presupposes a common understanding between the authorities and the public about the calibre of the threat and the necessity of the extraordinary measures. A trustworthy government should securitize an issue of its preference easier than an untrustworthy government. Hong Kong, our case study, is unique because of the government’s success with securitizing the pandemic in a context of extremely low political trust. Among the exceptional mechanisms that the government of Hong Kong utilized to control the outbreak were smart technologies. This paper examines the extent to which trust in the government and trust in smart technologies influenced the success of the securitization of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. To answer this question, we build on publicly available surveys assessing political trust in Hong Kong, on tailormade questionnaires investigating the sentiments of Hong Kong citizens towards smart technologies and on a Focus Group exercise with carefully selected residents of Hong Kong. The results of this study suggest that under certain circumstances, governments can successfully securitize a health-emergency even when they do not enjoy high levels of political trust.

política del miedo en la securitización de la pandemia de COVID-19

“…Aunque esta teoría ha sido ampliamente desarrollada, tal y como se desprende de la bibliografía antes citada, sorprende constatar que hasta la fecha no se ha llevado a cabo ninguna investigación que analice la relación entre este marco teórico y las ideas de thomas Hobbes acerca del miedo y la seguridad. Incluso los más recientes estudios de la pandemia de coronavirus que han asumido esta perspectiva teórica no abordan esta conexión con el pensamiento de Hobbes (kirk y McDonald, 2021;Hai, 2022;Dietrich et al, 2023;Diez, 2023;Stivas y Cole, 2023;Molnár et al, 2020;Dela Cruz et al, 2022;Chairil, 2020; kuteleva y Clifford, 2021; Pfrimer y Barbosa, 2020; Baele y Rousseau, 2022). Por este motivo el presente estudio trata de llenar esta laguna en la literatura académica al plantear un enfoque de la teoría de la securitización desde el prisma de la filosofía política de Hobbes.…”

Terrorism and Refugee Perceptions: Comparative Analysis of Germany and Türki̇ye

“…Subsequent to the surge in migration flows and the terrorist attacks perpetrated by violent-non state organization or terrorist groups like ISIS in Europe in 2015, media and political actors sought to draw associations between these phenomena. This environment effectively paved the way for the securitization of migration, particularly through the discourse of "terrorism" (Stivas, 2020).…”