2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterion effects in protein nanoparticle electrostatic binding: A theoretical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a and b, the increase of IS (from 0.01 M to 0.3 M) leads to the RMSD of adsorbed lysozyme slightly decreasing for the same size SNP, since it might screen the electrostatic attraction between adsorbed lysozyme and different-sized SNPs and thus cause a reduction of conformation loss. 54 Meanwhile, Ghosh et al 55,56 suggested that Na + can unfold proteins. Since there are more Na + ions in systems of strongly negatively charged SNPs, an interfacial Na + layer can be formed independently without the increase of IS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4a and b, the increase of IS (from 0.01 M to 0.3 M) leads to the RMSD of adsorbed lysozyme slightly decreasing for the same size SNP, since it might screen the electrostatic attraction between adsorbed lysozyme and different-sized SNPs and thus cause a reduction of conformation loss. 54 Meanwhile, Ghosh et al 55,56 suggested that Na + can unfold proteins. Since there are more Na + ions in systems of strongly negatively charged SNPs, an interfacial Na + layer can be formed independently without the increase of IS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential reason for this phenomenon is that the interfacial Na + layer formed around strongly negatively charged SNP surfaces can weaken the effect of IS, although it would not be favorable for keeping lysozyme conformation. 55,56 Another possible reason is that Na + tends to stay in the bulk, 63,64 although there is a strong electrostatic attraction between Na + and the strongly negatively charged SNPs. Therefore, for the system of SNPs, the effect of IS is not obvious for the formation of interfacial hydration layer, and it might be the internal reason for the increase of solution IS not significantly affecting adsorption behavior, which was observed in previous experiments also.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our experimental results, it was evident that only CPC coated IONPs were toxic to Raji cancer cells which could be realized using the RCPC model [35]: (i) electrostatic binding of CPC-IONPs with negative components of the cell membrane and (ii) subsequent release of counterions (Cl − ) and unfolding of proteins or lipids in the membrane which caused fragmentation and cell death (Figs. 3(C) and (D)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Electrostatic binding of proteins causes counterions to release from the charged coating of nanoparticles and diffuse into interior of bound proteins, disrupt their hydrophobic core and hydrogen bonds to unfold [34]. This model of unfolding of proteins was named the reverse charge parity counterions (RCPC) model [35] and has been observed to work successfully for different proteins [36,37]. This model thus describes the selective toxicity of counterions-conjugated charged IONPs to proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al have reported the effects of surface compositional and structural heterogeneity on protein adsorption by examining the interaction of self-assembled monolayer coated gold NPs (AuNPs) with two types of proteins: ubiquitin and fibrinogen [150]. The surface coating on nanoparticles with charged and neutral molecules shows different affinities to the binding of proteins and it causes irreversible conformational unfolding of proteins if counterions are present in the coating molecules [151][152][153][154][155][156]. Corona alters the size and interfacial composition of a nanoparticle, giving it a distinct 'biological identity' from that of the original one [157,158].…”
Section: Protein-nanoparticle Interactions and Signaling Pathways In Cancer Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%