2019
DOI: 10.21314/jor.2019.411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counterparty risk: credit valuation adjustment variability and value-at-risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, if the counterparty ends up in financial distress, it is reasonable to assume that the bank (which in this chapter is assumed to be the risk-free party) would be more willing to exercise the callable derivatives, in order to lower its exposure to the counterparty. Even though it seems common to ignore the effect of a defaultable counterparty when computing risky derivative values, it has been discussed in the literature, see e.g., [55], [38], [39] and [56]. In the case of a single derivative [55] states that the exercise region for a risk-free derivative is always a subset of the exercise region for a risky counterpart.…”
Section: Risky Valuation and Cvamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, if the counterparty ends up in financial distress, it is reasonable to assume that the bank (which in this chapter is assumed to be the risk-free party) would be more willing to exercise the callable derivatives, in order to lower its exposure to the counterparty. Even though it seems common to ignore the effect of a defaultable counterparty when computing risky derivative values, it has been discussed in the literature, see e.g., [55], [38], [39] and [56]. In the case of a single derivative [55] states that the exercise region for a risk-free derivative is always a subset of the exercise region for a risky counterpart.…”
Section: Risky Valuation and Cvamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately compute the risky option value, one needs to adjust the exercise strategy for the risk of a default of the counterparty. Therefore, it is not sufficient to compute the exposure of the option when computing the CVA (for a discussion see e.g., [38], [39]). With minor adjustments to the proposed algorithm, one could compute this kind of advanced CVA (as opposed to the approximation, which is based on the exposure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%