2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:coge.0000041021.91777.1a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting Alleles with Rarefaction: Private Alleles and Hierarchical Sampling Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
477
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 612 publications
(492 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
477
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Allelic richness of populations of an endangered tree species was compared to identify genetically diverse populations so that these populations could be protected (Petit et al 1998). The number of rare alleles in a population (private allelic richness) is a simple measure of genetic distinctiveness (Kalinowski 2004). A total of 20 rare alleles were identified from the eight polymorphic loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allelic richness of populations of an endangered tree species was compared to identify genetically diverse populations so that these populations could be protected (Petit et al 1998). The number of rare alleles in a population (private allelic richness) is a simple measure of genetic distinctiveness (Kalinowski 2004). A total of 20 rare alleles were identified from the eight polymorphic loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program HP-RARE version June 2006 (Kalinowski, 2004;2005) was used to estimate allelic richness and private allelic richness with a rarefaction method to account for uneven sample sizes. The program GenePop 4.2.2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, genetic diversity within populations is fundamental for conservation biology; better adaptation potential is expected in populations with high levels of genetic diversity (Kalinowski, 2004). The main parameters that are used to evaluate the intrapopulational genetic diversity include allelic diversity, H o , H e , and the inbreeding coefficient (Berg & Hamrick, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%