2006
DOI: 10.1080/00063650609461446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting birds on farmland habitats in winter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The product of habitat‐specific bird density and habitat area estimates gave regional habitat‐specific population estimates. These were summed across regions and as the field methods were not sufficiently intensive to provide absolute counts for certain species (Atkinson et al. 2006), all habitat‐specific population estimates were divided by the total estimate to give the percentage of birds associated with each habitat type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product of habitat‐specific bird density and habitat area estimates gave regional habitat‐specific population estimates. These were summed across regions and as the field methods were not sufficiently intensive to provide absolute counts for certain species (Atkinson et al. 2006), all habitat‐specific population estimates were divided by the total estimate to give the percentage of birds associated with each habitat type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When counting birds in a plot, the observer is allowed to search for quiet birds and track down unfamiliar vocalizations for visual identification or tape-recording for subsequent identification (ralpH et al, 1993). The area-search method has been used to count birds in grassland habitats, and enhancing detectability of secretive species is one of its main advantages (Dieni & Jones, 2002;atkinson et al, 2006;roberts & scHnell, 2006). Because we were interested in an index of abundance rather than density estimates, area-search enabled us to better locate secretive species in tall vegetation than the time-consuming spotmapping or distance sampling methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though 30% of individuals congregated on stubble, this is not a very large percentage in comparison with other studies. In the UK, for example, more than 40% of all birds were concentrated on stubble (Atkinson et al 2006, Perkins et al 2008. The higher proportion of birds that we recorded on stubble could be explained in part by the smaller area of fallow land in Poland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…fallow land), stubble and specific habitats such as manure heaps. For more open habitats (ploughed fields, winter cereals) the much less time-consuming perimeter count method was used, because it is reliable for most species, including thrushes, flocking finches and buntings (Atkinson et al 2006). In the present study only small granivorous passerine species were analyzed because the harsh climatic conditions in Poland restricted wintering numbers of other species that feed on small soil invertebrates (Orl / / / / / owski 2006).…”
Section: Field Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%