2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-014-0294-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting commensurability classes of hyperbolic manifolds

Abstract: Gromov and Piatetski-Shapiro proved existence of finite volume non-arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds of any given dimension. In dimension four and higher, we show that there are about v v such manifolds of volume at most v, considered up to commensurability. Since the number of arithmetic ones tends to be polynomial, almost all hyperbolic manifolds are non-arithmetic in an appropriate sense. Moreover, by restricting attention to non-compact manifolds, our result implies the same growth type for the number of qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, let C n (v) denote the number of commensurability classes of hyperbolic n-manifolds admitting a representative of volume ≤ v, and B n (v) be the number of such classes represented by a geometric boundary of volume ≤ v. Of course B n (v) ≤ C n (v) ≤ µ n (v). As shown by Gelander and Levit [14], for all n ≥ 2 we have C n (v) ≥ v cv , for v large enough. By following their arguments and applying Theorem 1.1, we prove the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, let C n (v) denote the number of commensurability classes of hyperbolic n-manifolds admitting a representative of volume ≤ v, and B n (v) be the number of such classes represented by a geometric boundary of volume ≤ v. Of course B n (v) ≤ C n (v) ≤ µ n (v). As shown by Gelander and Levit [14], for all n ≥ 2 we have C n (v) ≥ v cv , for v large enough. By following their arguments and applying Theorem 1.1, we prove the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Proof of Theorem 1.3 (counting geometric boundaries). In this section we follow the idea by Gelander and Levit from [14].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Quasi-arithmetic lattices; Theorem 1.3 shows that up to commensurability their covolumes are the same as in (1). (3) Lattices that come from the interbreeding constructions (see Gromov and Piateski-Shapiro [14], and generalizations [22,12]); note that those are not quasi-arithmetic [24, Theorem 1.6]. From their construction and Corollary 1.5 we obtain that their volumes are rational linear combinations of volumes from (1), in any case (the result being already clear when the construction only involves nonseparating hypersurfaces).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of this section has been an inspiration for some later works regarding counting manifolds, which have already been published [48,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%