2021
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2021.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting Differently: Assessing Mathematics Achievement of Signing Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children Through a Unique Lens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though, it is believed that language deprivation as characteristic of deaf learner may significantly challenge to mathematics abilities and achievement of deaf learners. Evidence in the last two decades have shown that deaf learners are between 2 and 4 years lagging behind their hearing peer in language acquisition and skills (Barbosa, 2013; Henner et al, 2021; Swanwick et al, 2005; Traxler, 2000; Tuller & Delage, 2014). Although, language potential of the deaf learner and their non‐deaf peer differs significantly when compared but even among the deaf learners, language abilities and richness in vocabulary content varies between those who are prelingually deaf and postlingually deaf (Adigun & Nzima, 2021; Ogundiran & Olaosun, 2013).…”
Section: Background To the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, it is believed that language deprivation as characteristic of deaf learner may significantly challenge to mathematics abilities and achievement of deaf learners. Evidence in the last two decades have shown that deaf learners are between 2 and 4 years lagging behind their hearing peer in language acquisition and skills (Barbosa, 2013; Henner et al, 2021; Swanwick et al, 2005; Traxler, 2000; Tuller & Delage, 2014). Although, language potential of the deaf learner and their non‐deaf peer differs significantly when compared but even among the deaf learners, language abilities and richness in vocabulary content varies between those who are prelingually deaf and postlingually deaf (Adigun & Nzima, 2021; Ogundiran & Olaosun, 2013).…”
Section: Background To the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it is important to consider that many studies investigated deaf native sign language users and their understanding of number concepts. Even though it is not entirely clear how children who are DHH with hearing parents use sign language, or how children who are DHH use spoken language perform, it was found that better sign language skills of students who are DHH tend to result in better mathematical performance (e.g., Henner et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it is important to consider that many studies investigated deaf native sign language users and their understanding of number concepts. Even though it is not entirely clear how children who are DHH with hearing parents use sign language, or how children who are DHH use spoken language perform, it was found that better sign language skills of students who are DHH tend to result in better mathematical performance (e.g., Henner et al, 2021 ). Taken together, the results on the mathematics performance of preschoolers are diverse, indicating that it is not quite easy to say where the mathematical difficulties of students who are DHH originate, yet certain delays appear to be present even before the school age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proficiency in sign language positively correlates with mathematical achievement in deaf children ( Henner, Pagliaro, Sullivan, & Hoffmeister, 2021 ; Hrastinski & Wilbur, 2016 ). Moreover, a positive impact of bimodal bilingual education on school performance has been demonstrated for deaf children with various language backgrounds: in mathematics specifically ( Lange et al, 2013 ) and in other aspects such as reading and spoken language proficiency ( Henner et al, 2015 ; Hermans et al, 2008 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a positive impact of bimodal bilingual education on school performance has been demonstrated for deaf children with various language backgrounds: in mathematics specifically ( Lange et al, 2013 ) and in other aspects such as reading and spoken language proficiency ( Henner et al, 2015 ; Hermans et al, 2008 . Deaf children from deaf families who have access to sign language at home show an advantage in standardized mathematic assessments, scoring on par or even better than their hearing peers ( Henner, Pagliaro, Sullivan, & Hoffmeister, i2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%