2018
DOI: 10.18666/jpra-2018-v36-i1-8104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting on Visitors: A Review of Methods and Applications for the National Park Service’s Visitor Use Statistics Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reality of compliance to this recommendation remains unknown. Despite the availability of relatively low-cost sensors and calls to increase monitoring to augment field observations ( English and Bowker, 2018 ; Jones et al, 2018 ; Snider et al, 2018 ; Ziesler and Pettebone, 2018 ), automated facility monitoring is not standard practice. Further, most existing monitoring devices do not measure distances between users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality of compliance to this recommendation remains unknown. Despite the availability of relatively low-cost sensors and calls to increase monitoring to augment field observations ( English and Bowker, 2018 ; Jones et al, 2018 ; Snider et al, 2018 ; Ziesler and Pettebone, 2018 ), automated facility monitoring is not standard practice. Further, most existing monitoring devices do not measure distances between users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of newer technologies have emerged to address these limitations, including video (Balouin et al, 2014;Smallwood et al, 2011), mobile device data (D'Antonio et al, 2010;Monz et al, 2019), and simulation models supported by remote sensing imagery (Huamantinco et al, 2016). These approaches can improve the collection of use level data in many environments, but a continuing problem exists in areas such as beaches that possess porous boundaries or unspecified access points (Ziesler & Pettebone, 2018). UAV technology can potentially overcome this issue because it is now affordable, easy to operate, and can obtain imagery within a short period of time (Ancin-Murguzur et al, 2019;Provost et al, 2019).…”
Section: Use Levels Encounters and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an area has specific access points or methods, direct counts of individual visits, hours, and overnight stays may be possible using the quantity of visitors via those specific access points or methods [14]. For example, a recreational area may only allow access through ticket sales at particular gates or may only be accessible via a guided tour, which would allow counting based upon ticket or tour sales.…”
Section: Direct Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agencies such as the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service commonly employ a variety of detection technologies and estimation methods using proxy counts, statistical relationships, or constants to estimate visitor use and provide continuous counts throughout the year. For example, rather than attempting to count each individual visit, parks may employ standard traffic monitoring technology to count and then convert vehicle counts into recreation or non-recreation visits using persons-per-vehicle multipliers [14]. The same procedure can be employed for visitors arriving by bus, boat, aircraft, canoe/kayak, motorcycle, or other modes of transportation.…”
Section: Proxy Counts and Multipliersmentioning
confidence: 99%