2017 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/dicta.2017.8227421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting People Based on Linear, Weighted, and Local Random Forests

Abstract: Recently, many works have been published for counting people. However, when being applied to real-world train station videos, they have exposed many limitations due to problems such as low resolution, heavy occlusion, various density levels and perspective distortions. In this paper, following the recent trend of regression-based density estimation, we present a linear regression approach based on local Random Forests for counting either standing or moving people on station platforms. By dividing each frame in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the performance of our A-CCNN algorithm, experiments are conducted on three challenging crowd counting datasets, i.e., the UCSD dataset [10], the UCF-CC dataset [11], and the dataset of Sydney Trains Footage (STF) [12]. Note that the first two are public benchmark datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of our A-CCNN algorithm, experiments are conducted on three challenging crowd counting datasets, i.e., the UCSD dataset [10], the UCF-CC dataset [11], and the dataset of Sydney Trains Footage (STF) [12]. Note that the first two are public benchmark datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subsection, we briefly introduce some special crowd counting datasets, which are only used in some certain scenarios. These datasets contain line crowd counting (LHI [137], [142], crowd sequences (PETS [138], Venice [86]), multi-sources (AHU-Crowd [139], [143], CI-ISR [149], Venice [86]), indoor (MICC [140], Indoor 1 [141], Indoor 2 [150]), train station (TS [144], STF [144]), subway station (Shanghai Subway Station [145]), BRT (Beijing BRT [146] 13 ), bridge (EBP [147]), airport (ZhengzhouAirport [151]), categorized [152]. The specific statistics of these datasets are listed in Tabel III.…”
Section: Some Special Crowd Counting Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4. Comparison of the MAE results results between A-CCNN and state-of-the-art crowd counting on STF [12].…”
Section: The Sydney Train Footagementioning
confidence: 99%