2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting public transport passenger using WiFi signatures of mobile devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, current Wi-Fi-based APCS based on MAC identification can effectively work only for obsolete operating systems (earlier than Android 5.0, iOS 7 and Windows Phone 8). In fact, with the aim to protect their users' privacy against device tracking, the main mobile operating system providers have introduced software randomization of MAC addresses [16]: the MAC address included in Probe Request frames is not the real MAC address associated to the Wi-Fi interface anymore, but it rather is randomly generated and it periodically changes.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, current Wi-Fi-based APCS based on MAC identification can effectively work only for obsolete operating systems (earlier than Android 5.0, iOS 7 and Windows Phone 8). In fact, with the aim to protect their users' privacy against device tracking, the main mobile operating system providers have introduced software randomization of MAC addresses [16]: the MAC address included in Probe Request frames is not the real MAC address associated to the Wi-Fi interface anymore, but it rather is randomly generated and it periodically changes.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they can effectively work only for obsolete operating systems (earlier than Android 5.0, iOS 7 and Windows Phone 8). In fact, with the aim to protect their users' privacy against device tracking, Google, Apple and Microsoft introduced software randomization of MAC addresses [16]: the claimed MAC address is randomly generated by a software, and it periodically changes.The impact of MAC address randomization on mobile device tracking is studied in [17], where the authors analyze the performance of different radomization techniques implemented for several different commercial off-the-shelf operating systems. Therefore, tracking devices is becoming not feasible anymore, as it is confirmed by [15], where TfL claims that they were unable to construct journeys when MAC addresses were randomized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Using probability density functions: In [9], a statistical approach is proposed as alternative to hard thresholds. Rather than using hard thresholds, m and ∆t are assumed to follow statistical distributions, conditional on whether the device is on the bus or not.…”
Section: Estimation Of Od Matrix Using Wi-fi and Apc Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of this paper is to apply the method proposed by the authors in [9] to estimate the OD matrix based on monitoring data of Wi-Fi data traffic and APC passenger load data. Wi-Fi monitoring equipment is installed in 32 buses in Stavanger, Norway, and continuously collects Wi-Fi data traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Mass transit management: Unlike traffic monitoring, mass transit management focuses on understanding the usage of mass transportation systems (buses, trains). For their project, the authors [83] placed a sensor inside a bus that counted when people came on and when they left the bus. They confirmed the results by manually counting people that entered…”
Section: Wifi Remote-positioning Use Cases 29mentioning
confidence: 99%