2013
DOI: 10.2144/000114056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting Unstained, Confluent Cells by Modified Bright-Field Microscopy

Abstract: We present a very simple procedure yielding high-contrast images of adherent, confluent cells such as human neuroblastoma (SH-EP) cells by ordinary bright-field microscopy. Cells are illuminated through a color filter and a pinhole aperture placed between the condenser and the cell culture surface. Refraction by each cell body generates a sharp, bright spot when the image is defocused. The technique allows robust, automatic cell counting from a single bright-field image in a wide range of focal positions; it d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five different areas were then randomly selected and imaged under a fluorescence microscope. The imaging data were analyzed using the ImageJ software program, and cell survival proportions were calculated by dividing the number of surviving cells at various time points after the switch to low glucose medium by the number of surviving cells before the switch [22-26]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five different areas were then randomly selected and imaged under a fluorescence microscope. The imaging data were analyzed using the ImageJ software program, and cell survival proportions were calculated by dividing the number of surviving cells at various time points after the switch to low glucose medium by the number of surviving cells before the switch [22-26]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a), all of the metrics provide reasonable performance for the absorbent object except for metrics (14) and (15). The result of metric (14) is a straight line because the minimum value of the images is always zero in this particular case leading to the constant contrast((maxima − 0)/(maxima + 0) = 1).…”
Section: Comparison Of Autofocus Metrics For Unstained Transparent Cementioning
confidence: 93%
“…For an in-focus image containing a high content of image detail we can expect that the contrast will be relatively large, while for a defocused monotone image we can expect it to be relatively small. 15. Histogram Entropy:…”
Section: Autofocus Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations