2016
DOI: 10.1080/15434303.2016.1212055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Country and Gender Differences in the Functioning of CEFR-Based Can-Do Statements as a Tool for Self-Assessing English Proficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to TLP, although not a separate and focused part of the study, it was found that there was a strong positive relationship between teachers' perceived language proficiency with the results they attained from the standardized tests they had taken. The strong relation between these two variables might arise from the fact that teachers who have taken a form of standardized test and have seen the result of this test have a better general prediction of their language proficiency, which is in line with studies from Faez & Karas, (2017) and Ross (1998), and even though this might not always be the case (Denies & Janssen, 2016), when used together with other instruments, in this study's case teachers' classroom observations, it can give a noteworthy inside on how well teachers can assess their own language proficiency.…”
Section: The Relation Between Tlp and Tesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In relation to TLP, although not a separate and focused part of the study, it was found that there was a strong positive relationship between teachers' perceived language proficiency with the results they attained from the standardized tests they had taken. The strong relation between these two variables might arise from the fact that teachers who have taken a form of standardized test and have seen the result of this test have a better general prediction of their language proficiency, which is in line with studies from Faez & Karas, (2017) and Ross (1998), and even though this might not always be the case (Denies & Janssen, 2016), when used together with other instruments, in this study's case teachers' classroom observations, it can give a noteworthy inside on how well teachers can assess their own language proficiency.…”
Section: The Relation Between Tlp and Tesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, self-assessment aspect of the CEFR has become a research interest; many studies have investigated contributions of the CEFR in foreign language learning in terms of self-assessment. Denies and Janssen (2016) presented the results of their study regarding self-assessments through application of 12 can-do statements from the CEFR by 22,500 language learners. The results indicated positive correlations between the results; also, background profiles of the participants affected their patterns of results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these do not measure teachers' actual proficiency, many researchers have noted that teachers' assessments of their own proficiency are often close assessments of their actual ability (Blanche and Merino, 1989;LeBlanc and Painchaud, 1985;Ross, 1998). However, some researchers would dispute this and question the objectivity of self-assessments (Denies and Janssen, 2016). Teachers may compare themselves to native speaker models and feel inadequate in comparison, which could impact their language confidence and potentially how they assess their own proficiency (Hodgson, 2014).…”
Section: Measuring Proficiency and (Self-) Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%