2020
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Country‐level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries

Abstract: Objectives: The Dark Triad traits (i.e., narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism) capture individual differences in aversive personality to complement work on other taxonomies, such as the Big Five traits. However, the literature on the Dark Triad traits relies mostly on samples from English-speaking (i.e., Westernized) countries. We broadened the scope of this literature by sampling from a wider array of countries. Method: We drew on data from 49 countries (N = 11,723; 65.8% female; Age Mean = 21.53) to exa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that all the dark triad traits were significantly higher, but moral disengagement was significantly lower in Chinese relative to Muslim participants. This is consistent with Jonason et al (2020) who found that narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy of China (4.41, 2.83, and 2.55) were generally higher than Egypt (4.14, 2.13, and 2.43), and Indonesia (3.72, 2.66, and 2.80), two Muslim countries. We have no evidence regarding the difference in moral disengagement scores between Chinese and Muslim students and its cultural implications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is noteworthy that all the dark triad traits were significantly higher, but moral disengagement was significantly lower in Chinese relative to Muslim participants. This is consistent with Jonason et al (2020) who found that narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy of China (4.41, 2.83, and 2.55) were generally higher than Egypt (4.14, 2.13, and 2.43), and Indonesia (3.72, 2.66, and 2.80), two Muslim countries. We have no evidence regarding the difference in moral disengagement scores between Chinese and Muslim students and its cultural implications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, extraverted characteristics (being outgoing, authoritative) are often considered socially desirable within individualistic cultures (e.g., Western society; Hills & Argyle, 2001). The higher scores of the Russian sample on Antagonism are consistent with the findings of Jonason et al (2020), who observed higher scores in comparison with the United Kingdom on the Dirty Dozen (a measure underpinned by antagonism; . This interesting finding requires further investigation to identify the cultural forces that contribute to these differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, given the cross-sectional nature of the study, the direction of causality between the variables could not be ascertained, and thus future longitudinal and experimental studies are certainly needed. Furthermore, in light of the cross-cultural differences reported in the levels of the DT ( Jonason et al, 2020 ), the present results need to be replicated in other national samples before more definitive conclusions can be drawn. Despite these limitations, this study is the first to show that the DT traits are associated with beliefs surrounding well-being, and provide evidence in support of the hypothesis that people with various levels of the DT traits gravitate towards certain notions of well-being that are per se beneficial or detrimental to well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%