2016
DOI: 10.1002/etep.2268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled active and reactive market in smart distribution system considering renewable distributed energy resources and demand response programs

Abstract: Summary In this paper a new framework is introduced to develop a coupled active and reactive market in distribution networks. Distributed energy resources (DERs) such as synchronous machine–based distributed generations and wind turbines offer their active and reactive powers to the proposed market. For the considered DERs, multicomponent reactive power bidding structures are introduced based on their capability curves. Also, the hourly speed variations of wind turbines are considered in the proposed model. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the separate dispatch scheduling cannot attain a global optimum scheme in the operation of distribution systems. Samimi et al through proposing an accurate model of the reactive power bidding structure for DG units optimizes energy and reactive power resources regarding to the technical and security constraints. In the study of Sausa et al, a multi‐objective methodology has been introduced to address the optimal active and reactive power scheduling considering the DGs, electric vehicles, and capacitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the separate dispatch scheduling cannot attain a global optimum scheme in the operation of distribution systems. Samimi et al through proposing an accurate model of the reactive power bidding structure for DG units optimizes energy and reactive power resources regarding to the technical and security constraints. In the study of Sausa et al, a multi‐objective methodology has been introduced to address the optimal active and reactive power scheduling considering the DGs, electric vehicles, and capacitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Samimi et al, a consecutive active and reactive power scheduling in SDNs with dispatchable DGs and WTs have been reported. Samimi et al have developed a joint active/reactive power market in SDNs with DR, which has been cleared using a deterministic approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously discussed, the main challenge in [26] is ignoring the imposed costs to the distribution system operator in the instantaneous market, which brings about an increment in distribution system operation costs. The presented approach in [27] has a similar structure and challenges with the presented approach in [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first structure, dispatching schedules of all capacitor banks, adjustment of OLTC transformer taps and the reactive power of DERs are optimally determined according to the load forecasted a day ahead. In this method, different objective functions such as the electrical energy costs, active power losses of the distribution system, sum of voltage deviations at the nodes of the network as well as the total CO 2 emissions of fuel fired electric generating units were utilized in the literature as the policies to accomplish the VVC scheme [11][12][13][14][15]. In [11], the optimum allocation of reactive power among all var sources has been determined based on Benders decomposition algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simultaneous active-reactive power dispatch schedule model has been introduced in [12] for modern distribution systems including renewable energy resources and responsive loads. In [13], a scenario-based probabilistic structure has been developed to extend a joint energy and VAr market for smart grids to cope with the uncertainties of forecasted load demands and wind power output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%