1988
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(88)90552-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled-channel effective-range expansion of low energy N¯N scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover our calculation reproduces the observed T=0 enhancement over T= 1 of annihilation cross sections for Plab < 400 MeV/c. The examined models, however, can not fully reproduce the very strong isospin dependence for P-wave annihilation from recent/5 (SHe, 4He) measurements in [23], where an annihilation cross section ratio ~r(T--1)/ a(T=0)=0.35 containing about 50% P-waves is reported, in accordance with the fits of J. Mahalanabis et al [24]. We obtain 0.7 for the P-wave average of this ratio, what may indicate the need of an energy and isospin dependence of the phenomenological annihilation potentials.…”
Section: Vn~ (R) = U (R) + W(r)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover our calculation reproduces the observed T=0 enhancement over T= 1 of annihilation cross sections for Plab < 400 MeV/c. The examined models, however, can not fully reproduce the very strong isospin dependence for P-wave annihilation from recent/5 (SHe, 4He) measurements in [23], where an annihilation cross section ratio ~r(T--1)/ a(T=0)=0.35 containing about 50% P-waves is reported, in accordance with the fits of J. Mahalanabis et al [24]. We obtain 0.7 for the P-wave average of this ratio, what may indicate the need of an energy and isospin dependence of the phenomenological annihilation potentials.…”
Section: Vn~ (R) = U (R) + W(r)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The parameters set (12) is just this updated version. The effective range solution [29] fairly well fits the low energy cross sections [25]- [28] which is an indication that the same is true for our parameter set (12). We urge our colleagues who are in possession of the experimental data to persuade the analysis whith the parameter sets [13,14].…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…The only substantial new piece of information concerns the total and annihilationpp andnp cross sections down to p Lab = 35 MeV/c [25,26]. However in the analysis of these data [27,28] use was made of the effective range solution [29] performed in 1988 which was later updated in 1991 [14] partly by the original authors. The parameters set (12) is just this updated version.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imposing the condition that the imaginary part of the effective range is negative we find low energy scattering parameters which interpolate between the existing ITEP [4] and CERN/Heidelberg [5] values. PACS: 13.75.-n; 13.75.cs Experiments in low energy NbT-scattering have developed greatly since the operation of the LEAR facility at CERN has started.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A comparison of N/V-intermediate range potentials with NN-potentials is perhaps the only chance to find the range where the meson-exchange picture breaks down and subnucleonic constituent interchange takes over. Unfortunately the strong NN-annihilation masks such a simple picture and only careful comparison to the data will clarify the situation.In this paper we follow up a model independent analysis of the low energy NiV interaction with the effective range expansion [4,5]. Previously there have been two quite different solutions obtained from the data with pc<300 MeV/c.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%