Continuous densification procedures such as calendering are crucial for sulfide‐based solid‐state batteries to realize industry‐relevant processing. Therefore, this study investigates the impact of line load, roller circumferential speed and roll temperature on slurry‐based Li3PS4 and Li6PS5Cl separators compressed by a lab‐calender installed in an argon‐gas filled glovebox. While Li3PS4 layer become fragile in compressed state, the tested Li6PS5Cl separator is more suitable for calendering due to better mechanical stability. Next to basic analysis of, for example, density, length expansion, pore size distribution and specific ionic conductivity, 3D structures are generated based on images obtained by synchrotron tomography. All calendered separators showed particle breakage of the Li6PS5Cl. A slight decrease of the specific ionic conductivity with increased applied line load or pressure, respectively, is observed for both calendering and uniaxial pressing. However, expected increase of the conductivity was obtained for an increase of the stack pressure. Next to poorer contacting at low stack pressure, it is assumed that springback effect after densification could affect negatively the microstructure of the separator. These results highlight the opportunities and challenges in terms of calendering of sulfide‐based separators, as well as the complex correlations between densification, stack pressure and choice of material.