2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian finite element modeling of friction stir welding processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have used point tracking method to predict material flow and found out that major material flow takes place from the advancing side of the weld, which lead to higher strain on the advancing side as compared to the retreating side. The researchers [16] have used coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method to simulate FSW process. They have used Johnson-Cook material model to define flow stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have used point tracking method to predict material flow and found out that major material flow takes place from the advancing side of the weld, which lead to higher strain on the advancing side as compared to the retreating side. The researchers [16] have used coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method to simulate FSW process. They have used Johnson-Cook material model to define flow stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation of FSW has been performed using finite element method (FE) models, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) models, or finite volume method (FV) models. For example, over the last years, Al-Badour et al [7] built a 3D localized FE model in which the workpiece and the tool are modeled using Eulerian and Lagrangian formulation, respectively, to predict likely conditions that result in defect generation during FSW process. Albakri et al [8] developed a CFD-based fully coupled 3D thermomechanical model to better understand the effect of process parameters on temperature, material flow, and strain rate during the FSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e contact conditions between the shoulder and workpiece in the shoulderplunging stage at different steps are exhibited in Figure 8. e surface heat flux from the shoulder q s can be described by equation (9)…”
Section: Advances In Materials Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e CFD models can describe the thermomechanical interaction between the tool and workpiece, and the most important consideration in the frictional boundary condition is the determination of the contact state [8]. In many CFD models, the contact conditions at the tool/workpiece interface are considered as full sticking, which usually leads to an overestimation of peak temperature [8][9][10]. Atharifar et al [11] assumed a sliding contact state during FSW, in which the velocity of material at the tool/workpiece interface was artificially defined as 60% of the tool velocity to investigate the loads carried by the tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%