2020
DOI: 10.1177/1464420720921211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled finite and discrete element shot peening simulation based on Johnson–Cook material model

Abstract: Shot peening is an essential treatment that produces a beneficial compressive layer on the material’s surface, which significantly improves its fatigue life. To minimizes the cost and resources used in determining the finest shot peening parameters based on the experimental approach, a numerical model capable of computing the induced compressive residual stress accurately is required. Hence, the numerical simulation of the shot peening process with multiple random shots that depict the actual shot peening is p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Johnson-Cook model parameters for the AA 2219 determined in Ahmad etal. 29 are used in this work. The properties of the AA 2219 and SAE 1070 peening media, as well as the Johnson-Cook model parameters used in this work are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Post-weld Sp Process Using The Combined Dem-femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Johnson-Cook model parameters for the AA 2219 determined in Ahmad etal. 29 are used in this work. The properties of the AA 2219 and SAE 1070 peening media, as well as the Johnson-Cook model parameters used in this work are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Post-weld Sp Process Using The Combined Dem-femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although different shot peening process parameters may yield similar results, shot peening intensity and coverage were regarded as key parameters for the industry [8,9]. In the context of shot peening, coverage was defined as the percentage of the target surface area covered by indentations according to the SAE J2277 standard 2013 [10,11]. On the other hand, shot peening intensity was characterized by the Almen intensity [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [26] employed a DEM-FEM coupling simulation method to predict coverage, compressive residual stresses, and surface roughness resulting from shot peening. Ahmad et al [10] established a numerical simulation model that was experimentally validated to evaluate the impact of shot peening velocity, projectile size, and impact angle on residual stress. Marini et al [27] explored the potential of DEM-FEM simulation for edge shot peening processes, and the predicted residual stress fields were in good agreement with the experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the simulation results agreed well with the experimental results. Ahmad et al [19] investigated the effects of θ and v 0 on RS by DEM-FEM coupling method. The results showed that compressive RS increased with the increase of θ and v 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%