Abstract:The application of a new Material Point Method (MPM) approach to model the proppant distribution in a reservoir where hydraulic fractures interact with natural fractures is presented and validated with an Eagle Ford well. The new MPM approach uses particles to represent the slurry and its effects on the hydraulic and natural fractures. The particles are injected in the hydraulic fractures and their action causes the hydraulic fractures to propagate and interact with the natural fractures thus providing new pat… Show more
“…To better explain these observations and prevent the poor placement of proppant by simulating the impact of natural fractures, the macroscopic proppant modeling using the MPM approach was introduced and validated with real field data (Raymond et al, 2015). A brief summary of this method and its use to better understand the role of fracture length and stress anisotropy is described in the following sections.…”
Section: Proppant Placement In Current Unconventional Playsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the previous model Nairn, 2014, Aimene and where the effect of the fluid in the hydraulic fractures was modeled by a traction law mimicking the fluid pressure on the fracture surfaces, Raymond et al (2015) introduced a new model that takes into account the complex multiphysics of hydraulic fracturing, by explicitly including the effect of the injected mixture of fluid and proppant (slurry) in the hydraulic fractures. The slurry represents the proppant as particles that are injected inside the hydraulic fractures.…”
Section: Modeling Proppant Distribution In the Presence Of Natural Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-4 show the final time step for the simulation of proppant injection into a hydraulic fracture that propagates, intersects the natural fracture then dilate it by placing proppant. The dynamic evolution of this process can be found in Raymond et al (2015) and in this paper we compare only the last time step of the various cases where the natural fracture length or the stress anisotropy varies.…”
Section: Figure 1-schematic Of Elementary Tests Involving One Hydraulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 (left). With these new tests added to those described in Raymond et al (2015), it is becoming clear that multiple natural fracture characteristics could have an impact on the propped volume which means that in real well examples where multiple fracture lengths and orientations and varying differential stress conditions exist, the resulting propped volume will be a complex result. To illustrate this complexity and its impact on the well performance, we will consider an Eagle Ford well and its nine stages to estimate the propped volume.…”
Section: Figure 1-schematic Of Elementary Tests Involving One Hydraulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the well performance is also controlled by the proppant placement beyond the near-wellbore thus the need to introduce a new approach. Raymond et al (2015) introduced a new macroscopic approach based on the use of the Material Point Method (MPM) to model the proppant placement at the scale of the entire well thus providing the opportunity to evaluate the effects of natural fractures on the resulting proppant placement which ultimately will assist shale operators better understand their well performance. To better illustrate the importance of this topic, three actual case studies from current unconventional plays where the natural fractures are playing a major role in controlling the proppant placement are summarized.…”
The application of a new Material Point Method (MPM) approach to model the proppant distribution in a reservoir where hydraulic fractures interact with natural fractures is presented and validated with an Eagle Ford well. The new MPM approach uses particles to represent the slurry and its effects on the hydraulic and natural fractures. The particles are injected in the hydraulic fractures and their action causes the hydraulic fractures to propagate and interact with the natural fractures thus providing new pathways for the proppant to move away from the wellbore when optimal natural fracture orientations are encountered. Elementary tests showed that long fractures oriented in 30 and 60 degree from the hydraulic fracture directions facilitate the proppant placement. However, the stress anisotropy seems to have little effects for fractures oriented in 30 and 60 degree but allows a better proppant placement for fracture oriented 90 degrees from the hydraulic fracture. The application of the new technology to an entire Eagle Ford well shows that the simulated proppant indicates a large propped volume towards the heel and a poor proppant placement at the toe stages as indicated by other methods. These field validated results, show that the macroscopic modeling of proppant distribution using the coupled solid/fluid MPM technology could be used in improving our understanding of the complex hydraulic fracturing process and the resulting proppant distribution that provide the needed initial stimulated permeability.
“…To better explain these observations and prevent the poor placement of proppant by simulating the impact of natural fractures, the macroscopic proppant modeling using the MPM approach was introduced and validated with real field data (Raymond et al, 2015). A brief summary of this method and its use to better understand the role of fracture length and stress anisotropy is described in the following sections.…”
Section: Proppant Placement In Current Unconventional Playsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the previous model Nairn, 2014, Aimene and where the effect of the fluid in the hydraulic fractures was modeled by a traction law mimicking the fluid pressure on the fracture surfaces, Raymond et al (2015) introduced a new model that takes into account the complex multiphysics of hydraulic fracturing, by explicitly including the effect of the injected mixture of fluid and proppant (slurry) in the hydraulic fractures. The slurry represents the proppant as particles that are injected inside the hydraulic fractures.…”
Section: Modeling Proppant Distribution In the Presence Of Natural Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-4 show the final time step for the simulation of proppant injection into a hydraulic fracture that propagates, intersects the natural fracture then dilate it by placing proppant. The dynamic evolution of this process can be found in Raymond et al (2015) and in this paper we compare only the last time step of the various cases where the natural fracture length or the stress anisotropy varies.…”
Section: Figure 1-schematic Of Elementary Tests Involving One Hydraulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 (left). With these new tests added to those described in Raymond et al (2015), it is becoming clear that multiple natural fracture characteristics could have an impact on the propped volume which means that in real well examples where multiple fracture lengths and orientations and varying differential stress conditions exist, the resulting propped volume will be a complex result. To illustrate this complexity and its impact on the well performance, we will consider an Eagle Ford well and its nine stages to estimate the propped volume.…”
Section: Figure 1-schematic Of Elementary Tests Involving One Hydraulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the well performance is also controlled by the proppant placement beyond the near-wellbore thus the need to introduce a new approach. Raymond et al (2015) introduced a new macroscopic approach based on the use of the Material Point Method (MPM) to model the proppant placement at the scale of the entire well thus providing the opportunity to evaluate the effects of natural fractures on the resulting proppant placement which ultimately will assist shale operators better understand their well performance. To better illustrate the importance of this topic, three actual case studies from current unconventional plays where the natural fractures are playing a major role in controlling the proppant placement are summarized.…”
The application of a new Material Point Method (MPM) approach to model the proppant distribution in a reservoir where hydraulic fractures interact with natural fractures is presented and validated with an Eagle Ford well. The new MPM approach uses particles to represent the slurry and its effects on the hydraulic and natural fractures. The particles are injected in the hydraulic fractures and their action causes the hydraulic fractures to propagate and interact with the natural fractures thus providing new pathways for the proppant to move away from the wellbore when optimal natural fracture orientations are encountered. Elementary tests showed that long fractures oriented in 30 and 60 degree from the hydraulic fracture directions facilitate the proppant placement. However, the stress anisotropy seems to have little effects for fractures oriented in 30 and 60 degree but allows a better proppant placement for fracture oriented 90 degrees from the hydraulic fracture. The application of the new technology to an entire Eagle Ford well shows that the simulated proppant indicates a large propped volume towards the heel and a poor proppant placement at the toe stages as indicated by other methods. These field validated results, show that the macroscopic modeling of proppant distribution using the coupled solid/fluid MPM technology could be used in improving our understanding of the complex hydraulic fracturing process and the resulting proppant distribution that provide the needed initial stimulated permeability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.