2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled groundwater flow and contaminant transport simulation in a confined aquifer using meshfree radial point collocation method (RPCM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve these equations, there are two different approaches, namely the analytical and the numerical approaches. Different numerical approaches, such as finite difference methods (FDM) [8], finite element methods (FEM) [9][10][11][12][13][14], finite volume methods (FVM) [15] and Meshfree methods including radial point collocation method (RPCM) [16,17], and radial base functions (RBFS) [18,19] can be utilised to solve the governing equation of the flow and solute transport in groundwater. The selection of the best method among these depends on site-specific needs, availability of input data, expectation and use of the model results, and the analytical solution can be used as a benchmark to show the accuracy of the numerical approach used, considering different conditions such as the aquifer's heterogeneity [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these equations, there are two different approaches, namely the analytical and the numerical approaches. Different numerical approaches, such as finite difference methods (FDM) [8], finite element methods (FEM) [9][10][11][12][13][14], finite volume methods (FVM) [15] and Meshfree methods including radial point collocation method (RPCM) [16,17], and radial base functions (RBFS) [18,19] can be utilised to solve the governing equation of the flow and solute transport in groundwater. The selection of the best method among these depends on site-specific needs, availability of input data, expectation and use of the model results, and the analytical solution can be used as a benchmark to show the accuracy of the numerical approach used, considering different conditions such as the aquifer's heterogeneity [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swathi and Eldho (2014) developed a simulation model with meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPGM) for the unconfined groundwater flow. Guneshwor Singh et al (2016) used the meshless radial point collocation method (RPCM) for solving the coupled GFCT equations for the confined aquifer. Later, Guneshwor et al (2018) combined the GFCT simulations of RPCM with particle swarm optimization (PSO) for identifying the unknown contaminant sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, Meshfree (MFree) method is proposed for the analysis of seawater intrusion problem. Mesh Free method has been used earlier to model the groundwater flow and solute transport problems [9]- [17]. It was found to be more effective because of its advantages over the mesh based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%