2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled hydrodynamic and ecological simulation for prognosticating land reclamation impacts in river estuaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the complexity of these models and the frequent data limitations (e.g., lack of continuous in situ data), it is rare to find studies performing both processes simultaneously, as recognized by Whitehead et al [65] and Tomic et al [66]. By these reasons, a large number of modeling studies perform only one of these processes (e.g., [67][68][69][70]), or alternatively perform both processes for a very limited period or even solely based on seasonal data ( [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]). For the present study, and despite the common data limitations, both processes were performed for the hydrodynamic and water quality module in the Delft3D model implementation, following the procedures described below, and data sets presented in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complexity of these models and the frequent data limitations (e.g., lack of continuous in situ data), it is rare to find studies performing both processes simultaneously, as recognized by Whitehead et al [65] and Tomic et al [66]. By these reasons, a large number of modeling studies perform only one of these processes (e.g., [67][68][69][70]), or alternatively perform both processes for a very limited period or even solely based on seasonal data ( [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]). For the present study, and despite the common data limitations, both processes were performed for the hydrodynamic and water quality module in the Delft3D model implementation, following the procedures described below, and data sets presented in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%