2008
DOI: 10.13182/nt08-a3975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled In-Rock and In-Drift Hydrothermal Model Study for Yucca Mountain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons showed good agreement between the results from the monolithic model [8,9] and those from the coupled MF model, configured with equivalent dispersion transport processes along the axial direction of the emplacement drift [12]. The current paper goes beyond the previous MF model configurations of equivalent dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparisons showed good agreement between the results from the monolithic model [8,9] and those from the coupled MF model, configured with equivalent dispersion transport processes along the axial direction of the emplacement drift [12]. The current paper goes beyond the previous MF model configurations of equivalent dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The length of the unheated sections are kept at 80 m, the same length used by Birkholzer et al [8,9] in order to evaluate agreements and/or differences caused by transport model components instead of arrangement geometry. It has been pointed out before by Danko et al [12] that the axial moisture transport and the humidity in the emplacement drift are quite sensitive to the length of the unheated sections. The unheated drift sections are connected to the undisturbed and also unheated edges, which provide a dominantly conductive heat sink to the heated portion of the rockmass around the center of the emplacement drift.…”
Section: Thermal-hydrologic Model Of the Rockmassmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To fully account for 3-D effects, a first model (MF-T2) operates on a scale that encompasses the entire drift plus surrounding ro c k units. In MF-T2, the flow and transport processes in the ro c k mass are simulated with the multiphase, multicomponent simulator TOUGH2, and the in-drift heat and moisture flows are simulated with MULTIFLUX (MF), a lumped-parameter CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) code (Danko et al, 2007). MF p rovides an efficient iterative coupling technique for matching the mass and heat transfer between the rock mass and the drift.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%