2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled nutricline and productivity variations during the Pliocene in the western Pacific warm pool and their paleoceanographic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The age model used for Site U1490 since ∼5.1 Ma was obtained by comparing the Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi δ 18 O (VPDB, Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite) curve and the standard LR04 stack (Lisiecki & Raymo, 2005), with additional five paleomagnetic constraints during the Pleistocene (Figure S2 in Supporting Information ). The stratigraphy for Site U1490 since 1.4 Ma and from 5.1 to 2.6 Ma used here were published previously (Qin, Jia, et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2022). The rest of the stratigraphy from 2.6 to 1.4 Ma was developed in the context of the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age model used for Site U1490 since ∼5.1 Ma was obtained by comparing the Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi δ 18 O (VPDB, Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite) curve and the standard LR04 stack (Lisiecki & Raymo, 2005), with additional five paleomagnetic constraints during the Pleistocene (Figure S2 in Supporting Information ). The stratigraphy for Site U1490 since 1.4 Ma and from 5.1 to 2.6 Ma used here were published previously (Qin, Jia, et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2022). The rest of the stratigraphy from 2.6 to 1.4 Ma was developed in the context of the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%