1978
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.18.1930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled-state calculations of proton—hydrogen-atom scattering using a scaled hydrogenic basis set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
72
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When referring to a perturbed stationary state approximation [31], this momentum conservation implies that the electron cloud should be endowed with inertia which keeps it moving on with its original velocity when its binding particle-system changes. Pictorially the effect of this inertia can be seen in contour plots of electronic charge distributions as a function of time for protonhydrogen collisions [32,33]. Though the authors who calculated these density distributions related the elongation of the final distributions into the direction of the collision partner to its "dragging" [32] or "attractive" [33] residual Coulomb force, we believe that the asymmetry is more correctly ascribed to the inertia of the electron cloud.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Excitation Processmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…When referring to a perturbed stationary state approximation [31], this momentum conservation implies that the electron cloud should be endowed with inertia which keeps it moving on with its original velocity when its binding particle-system changes. Pictorially the effect of this inertia can be seen in contour plots of electronic charge distributions as a function of time for protonhydrogen collisions [32,33]. Though the authors who calculated these density distributions related the elongation of the final distributions into the direction of the collision partner to its "dragging" [32] or "attractive" [33] residual Coulomb force, we believe that the asymmetry is more correctly ascribed to the inertia of the electron cloud.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Excitation Processmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This will improve the accuracy of the cross-section, since the contribution of the continuum states of the target is taken into account. Figure 1 represents our theoretical results (Schw66) of the total cross-section for the excitation of the 2s state of the hydrogen atom by proton impact, compared to experimental results (Higgins et al [4]) and other theoretical results (Schw55, Schw1414, Born1, Shakeshaft [5], Ford et al [6] and Slim [7]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance using polarized protons in the experimental set up of Hippler et al [-11], all the state multipoles characteristing the resulting H(2p)* state can be found from (16). Note that the orientation vector (r(1)~-l) , (r(1)x,_ 1), (r(1)~-o) =0 cannot be extracted from experiment without measurement of polarizations of Lyman-c~ radiation are done and compared with the relevant theoretical predictions [13] in Figs. 2, 3, they may prove to be a sensitive test for the various approximation schemes applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%