2021
DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1912740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Couples’ co-regulation dynamics as a function of perceived partner dyadic coping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, although EMS workers’ jobs are stressful and increase the risk for PTSD symptoms among their partners, partners may also experience VPTG in which they learn to develop positive psychological changes that lead to more adaptive life philosophies (Cleary et al, 2023). This is consistent with other research supporting co-regulation among couples (Randall et al, 2021). Other researchers suggest that VPTG tends to be more commonly associated with professional identity rather than personal traumatic experiences, common among EMS workers’ family members and first responder culture (Manning-Jones et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In other words, although EMS workers’ jobs are stressful and increase the risk for PTSD symptoms among their partners, partners may also experience VPTG in which they learn to develop positive psychological changes that lead to more adaptive life philosophies (Cleary et al, 2023). This is consistent with other research supporting co-regulation among couples (Randall et al, 2021). Other researchers suggest that VPTG tends to be more commonly associated with professional identity rather than personal traumatic experiences, common among EMS workers’ family members and first responder culture (Manning-Jones et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, the present study extends findings from previous studies that found a positive association between dyadic coping and empathy (Levesque et al, 2014), clarity of emotion perception by the partner (mainly in men) (Leuchtmann et al, 2018), and in the similarity of partners' ratings of their own emotions during dyadic interaction (Verhofstadt et al, 2008;Randall et al, 2021) found, emotional co-regulation is facilitated by positive dyadic coping and hindered by negative dyadic coping of both or higher negative dyadic coping of women (compared to men). Thus, it can be assumed that synchrony in f 0 stands for positive dyadic coping (expression of understanding, empathy, show solidarity) and contradicts negative dyadic coping.…”
Section: Emotional Resonance Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Dyadic coping is a form of emotional co-regulation (Randall et al, 2021). Accordingly, emotional arousal is an integral component of the dyadic coping process in which both partners should experience some degree of emotional arousal.…”
Section: The Emotional Climate Of Dyadic Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly interesting direction for further work will be to examine phenomena predicted by relationship theories. For example, some have posited coregulation, in which two members of a dyad mutually calm each other’s reactions to a mutual stress ( Butler, 2017 ; Randall et al, 2021 ). Elucidating the dyadic regulatory processes involving reactivity to and recovery from such the mutual stressors will help guiding precise and effective management of cardiovascular responses and negative affect for both members in the dyad.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%