2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling active and passive techniques to control the flow past the square back Ahmed body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This yields an increase of the magnitude of the velocity tangent to the base, which results in a reduction of the static pressure acting in the same region. When the vortical structures are squeezed towards the base, as in the case of the plane located at y * = 0.34, this relation becomes even stronger, in agreement with the results of the numerical simulations performed by Bruneau et al (2010).…”
Section: Contribution Of the Base Wall Velocity To The Dragsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This yields an increase of the magnitude of the velocity tangent to the base, which results in a reduction of the static pressure acting in the same region. When the vortical structures are squeezed towards the base, as in the case of the plane located at y * = 0.34, this relation becomes even stronger, in agreement with the results of the numerical simulations performed by Bruneau et al (2010).…”
Section: Contribution Of the Base Wall Velocity To The Dragsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The quantitative results reported in Table are also highlighted in Figures and , respectively, depicting the mean velocity and mean vorticity fields. As already emphasized in the literature , the main source of drag forces for bluff bodies with square back is the low‐pressure recirculation zone in the near wake of the vertical wall. With λ = 1, the near‐wake structures are smaller, and the back recirculation zone is drastically reduced (Figure ).…”
Section: Extension To Solid–porous–fluid Media and Flow Controlmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This provides a good motivation to perform flow control past such obstacles. Moreover, as it was shown in [49,50], a flow past a square back obstacle is not dominated by longitudinal vortical structures, therefore, a preliminary 2D study can be useful to supply information on general trends for a control.…”
Section: Modeling and Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Much work has been devoted to the 25 • slant angle configuration; significant drag reductions are achieved through passive or active control strategies such as splitter plates [3], flaps [4,5], boundary layer streaks [6] or even pulsed jets [7]. Diverse strategies equally provide interesting base pressure recovery in the square-back case: splitter plates [8], porous devices [9] or active control [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%