Wiley Encyclopedia of Composites 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118097298.weoc057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling Agents: Basics and Classifications

Abstract: This chapter comprehensively reviews the fundamental aspects and requirements leading to the introduction of coupling agents to composite science and technology. Classification of several existing coupling agents is presented in detail, marking the specific related applications. Future trends have also been outlined regarding the super‐complex phenomena of adhesion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lists the surface tensions of PP, PA6 and CB at 230°C which are available in the literature[23,24]. The interfacial tensions between the different blend components can be calculated based on equations (3.2) and (3.3), and the results are shown in table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lists the surface tensions of PP, PA6 and CB at 230°C which are available in the literature[23,24]. The interfacial tensions between the different blend components can be calculated based on equations (3.2) and (3.3), and the results are shown in table 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that this discreteness can be overcome by applying appropriate silane-based coupling agents and optimal FFF parameters. 26,27 On the other hand, the flexural modulus of the HGBs-filled composite specimens was slightly higher than the neat ABS one. This may be due to the high stiffness of the HGBs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the HGBs-filled composite specimens, the bonding strengths of the interacting functional groups of the neat ABS and HGBs could become relatively weak due to their different thermal expansion rates, and as a result, the flexural strength values could be decreased. 26,27 In addition, as shown in Figure 3(b), the S28HS-filled composite specimen has a lower flexural strength than the iM16K-filled specimen. In this study, the same weight fraction (5 wt%) of HGBs was applied in both cases of S28HS and iM16K-filled composite filaments.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%