1992
DOI: 10.1080/87565649209540516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling and lateralization in bimanual coordination at 7, 8, and 9 years of age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normal adults with an intact corpus callosum, by contrast, have no difficulty learning the same bimanual tasks (Jeeves, 1986;Preilowski, 1972;Teng & Sperry, 1974). Similarly, the importance of afunctionally mature corpus callosum is illustrated, for example, in normative developmental studies which indicate that normal 7-8-year-old children also encounter great d culties learning bilaterally asynchronous and asymmetric tasks, whereas normal 10-1 1 -year-old children perform such tasks almost as well as normal adults (Fagard et al, 1985;Fagard & Peze, 1992;Jeeves et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Normal adults with an intact corpus callosum, by contrast, have no difficulty learning the same bimanual tasks (Jeeves, 1986;Preilowski, 1972;Teng & Sperry, 1974). Similarly, the importance of afunctionally mature corpus callosum is illustrated, for example, in normative developmental studies which indicate that normal 7-8-year-old children also encounter great d culties learning bilaterally asynchronous and asymmetric tasks, whereas normal 10-1 1 -year-old children perform such tasks almost as well as normal adults (Fagard et al, 1985;Fagard & Peze, 1992;Jeeves et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are some grounds for thinking that bimanual coordination varies with handedness, even though little is known about this relationship because left-handers are usually excluded from the studies. Most bimanual studies which include lefthanders focus on the handedness-driven dynamics of bimanual coordination, where the preferred hand is leading (Amazeen, Amazeen, Treffner, & Turvey, 1997;Fagard & Pezé, 1992;Stucchi & Viviani, 1993;Swinnen, Jardin, & Meulenbroek, 1996;Treffner & Turvey, 1995, 1996Wuyts, Summers, Carson, Byblow, & Semjen, 1996) rather than on bimanual performance as a function of handedness. If mixed-and left-handers have greater interhemispheric integration than righthanders, then performance on a bimanual task should vary with handedness, at least on tasks for which the role of interhemispheric transfer has been demonstrated (Geffen, Jones, & Geffen, 1994;Jeeves, Silver, & Milne, 1988;Pelletier et al, 1993;Preilowski, 1972Preilowski, , 1977Preilowski, , 1990Zaidel & Sperry, 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first studies on drawing tasks in children showed that using both hands simultaneously led to errors in performing specific movements like copying parallel oblique lines (Abercrombie, Lindon, & Tyson, 1968). After this observation, different developmental studies focused on the difference between mirror (i.e., each hand moves toward an opposite “mirrored” direction, for instance one hand toward the left and the other toward the right in respect to the body midline) and parallel (i.e., each hand moves toward the same direction, for instance both hands toward the left) bimanual movements showing that drawing accuracy is higher in mirror versus parallel movements in 7-year-old children but that these differences decrease significantly in 8- to 10-year-old children (Fagard, 1987; Fagard, Hardy, Kervella, & Marks, 2001; Fagard & Pezé, 1992; Hauert & Steffen, 1987); furthermore, developmental advancements with mirror movements are earlier obtained than advancements with parallel bimanual movements during childhood (Fagard & Corroyer, 2003). Indeed, mirror movements are most prominent in young children (Utley & Steenbergen, 2006) but tend to disappear during the first decade of life (Lazarus & Todor, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%