2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling between finite volume method and lattice Boltzmann method and its application to fluid flow and mass transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, for the first time, the LBM is adopted to simulate the electrochemical processes (both reaction and transport) in a CL under PEMFC cathode conditions. The evolution equation for the concentration distribution function is as follows g i ðx þ c i Dt; t þ DtÞ À g i ðx; tÞ ¼ À 1 t g ðg i ðx; tÞ À g eq i ðx; tÞÞ þ a i S O 2 Dt (12) where g i is the distribution function with velocity c i at the lattice site x and time t. It is worth mentioning that for simple geometries, a D3Q7 (3 dimensional 7 lattice directions) lattice model (or D2Q5 model in 2D) is sufficient to accurately predict the diffusion process and properties, which can greatly reduce the computational resources, compared with D3Q19 (or D2Q9 in 2D), as proven by our previous work [29,33,34,[50][51][52][53]. For complex porous structures, especially for those with relatively low porosity such as CL, using a reduced lattice model will damage the connectivity of certain phases, thus leading to underestimated effective transport properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this work, for the first time, the LBM is adopted to simulate the electrochemical processes (both reaction and transport) in a CL under PEMFC cathode conditions. The evolution equation for the concentration distribution function is as follows g i ðx þ c i Dt; t þ DtÞ À g i ðx; tÞ ¼ À 1 t g ðg i ðx; tÞ À g eq i ðx; tÞÞ þ a i S O 2 Dt (12) where g i is the distribution function with velocity c i at the lattice site x and time t. It is worth mentioning that for simple geometries, a D3Q7 (3 dimensional 7 lattice directions) lattice model (or D2Q5 model in 2D) is sufficient to accurately predict the diffusion process and properties, which can greatly reduce the computational resources, compared with D3Q19 (or D2Q9 in 2D), as proven by our previous work [29,33,34,[50][51][52][53]. For complex porous structures, especially for those with relatively low porosity such as CL, using a reduced lattice model will damage the connectivity of certain phases, thus leading to underestimated effective transport properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In some interesting works, this C-E analysis is also applied to build a hybrid solver by combing the LBM with the FVM scheme for Navier-Stokes equations [37][38][39]. In our recent work [9,10], it was found that the relationship between flow variables/fluxes and particle distribution functions given in Equation (12) can be applied to build a new solver named LBFS with a better performance, which effectively combines the advantages of Navier-Stokes solver and lattice Boltzmann solver and at the same time removes some of their drawbacks.…”
Section: Chapman-enskog Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sh t (26) are directly used to define Sh kin and Sh M from Sh t data or theoretical considerations on the Sh t trend. On the other hand, the results are less accurate for high Sh M : in fact, the harmonic mean Equation (25) is automatically correct only when the diffusive and the reactive paths work strictly in series; on the contrary, in the system considered here, the diffusion and the reaction at the electrode surface work more in a series-parallel manner, so that Equation (25) must be considered as an approximation which respects the two asymptotic Solutions (26), but is affected by an appreciable error for intermediate conditions.…”
Section: The Harmonic Mean Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a way, different levels of approximation for the estimation of the local electrochemical kinetics are available. Neglecting here micro-and mesoscopic levels [26], the more accurate approach traditionally consists of detailed numerical simulation tools [7,8,11,16,21,27], which can be heavy to handle when commercial size cells or stack are considered. Advanced analytical studies have also been recently proposed, such as the fractal approach [28], which are useful to assess the main relationships which rule phenomena and influence performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%