Coupling Community Heterogeneity and Perceptions of Conservation in Rural South Africa

Abstract

Concerns about the impacts of national parks and protected areas upon local populations have generated significant interest in community conservation initiatives that attempt to include local knowledge and participation in natural resource decision-making. While there has been much interest in the institutional frameworks and livelihood impacts of community conservation, emerging research is documenting the various factors that shape local perceptions. This paper uses a case study of the Mahushe Shongwe Game Reserve in South Africa to examine the key variables shaping community perceptions of community conservation. We employ multinomial logistic regression models to understand views of the benefits and future direction of the reserve. These models are coupled with information collected from semi-structured interviews that assists in providing a detailed, and more complex, understanding of the diverse ways that community conservation is perceived by local residents. The paper demonstrates that multiple factors, particularly household history, education, and gender contribute in shaping views of the reserve. While these variables are often identified in the academic literature as important, we argue that the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods helps reveal the interplay between them in shaping perceptions of community conservation.

Effect of human disturbance on the structure and regeneration of forests in the Nevado de Toluca National Park, Mexico

“…In addition, this information could be essential in order to convince decision makers to develop and understand that vegetation changes, to establish policies which have to be addresses to maintain the natural forests and promote forest management programmes. As have been mentioned by King and Peralvo (2010) that concerns about the impacts of national parks and protected areas upon local populations have generated significant interest in community conservation initiatives that attempt to include local knowledge and participation in natural resource decision-making.…”

Making the case for biodiversity in South Africa: Re-framing biodiversity communications

“…Despite progressive biodiversity legislation (such as the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (10 of 2004)) and strong biodiversity policies in South Africa, poor communication leads to a perceived lack of integration between biodiversity and development that undermines the biodiversity sector's work within the broader social context. For example, long-term biodiversity objectives such as protected area expansion, may appear to conflict with the short-term priorities of economic development and job creation (Kepe et al 2004;King & Pervalo 2010;Snyman 2014). This conflict is further exacerbated by the fact that messaging from the biodiversity sector is often an unplanned collection of varied communications frames and differing terminology that does little to present a consistent and clear message.…”

Transforming Conservation into Cash? Nature Tourism in Southern Africa

“…A growing body of case studies, particularly within political ecology, documents how local residents fail to benefit from these types of conservation efforts (Blaikie 2006;King and Peralvo 2010;Purcell and Brown 2005;Zimmerer and Bassett 2003;Zulu 2009). Furthermore, the use of nature tourism to enhance economic well-being in southern Africa has been criticized for providing little upward mobility for workers and its instability as an income source (Mbaiwa 2003;Okech 2010).…”