2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling DNA Damage and Repair: an Essential Safeguard during Programmed DNA Double-Strand Breaks?

Abstract: DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most toxic DNA lesions given their oncogenic potential. Nevertheless, programmed DSBs (prDSBs) contribute to several biological processes. Formation of prDSBs is the price to pay to achieve these essential biological functions. Generated by domesticated PiggyBac transposases, prDSBs have been integrated in the life cycle of ciliates. Created by Spo11 during meiotic recombination, they constitute a driving force of evolution and ensure balanced chromosome content for succ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously proposed a model of "double DNA repair synapse" during V(D)J recombination according to which the X4-Xlf "filament" and the RAG1/2 post cleavage complex (PCC), together with ATM and PAXX, provide two complementary means of DNA end synapsis (Abramowski et al, 2018;Betermier et al, 2020;Lescale, Abramowski, et al, 2016). To address the role of X4 in this model, we crossed Xrcc4 M61R onto Paxx-/-and Atm-/-mice (hereafter denoted Xrcc4 M61R -Paxx and Xrcc4 M61R -Atm).…”
Section: Paxx and Atm Are Compensatory Factors For X4 In Lymphoid Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We previously proposed a model of "double DNA repair synapse" during V(D)J recombination according to which the X4-Xlf "filament" and the RAG1/2 post cleavage complex (PCC), together with ATM and PAXX, provide two complementary means of DNA end synapsis (Abramowski et al, 2018;Betermier et al, 2020;Lescale, Abramowski, et al, 2016). To address the role of X4 in this model, we crossed Xrcc4 M61R onto Paxx-/-and Atm-/-mice (hereafter denoted Xrcc4 M61R -Paxx and Xrcc4 M61R -Atm).…”
Section: Paxx and Atm Are Compensatory Factors For X4 In Lymphoid Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Living organisms face DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most toxic DNA lesions, from random or programmed (prDSBs) origins (Betermier, Borde, & de Villartay, 2020), such as during the development of the adaptive immune system through V(D)J recombination. V(D)J recombination results in the somatic rearrangement of variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) elements of antigen receptor loci in T-and B-cell precursors (Jung, Giallourakis, Mostoslavsky, & Alt, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We speculate that functional diversification of duplicated KU genes in ciliates and the pressure for precise IES excision may have favored the emergence of different types of coupling between DNA double-strand endonucleases and DSB repair factors, as a solution to face the threat represented by massive programmed rearrangements on genome integrity. Thus, work on ciliates may provide a general framework for the coupling between DNA cleavage and DSB repair during other programmed biological processes, such as V(D)J recombination of immunoglobulin genes in vertebrates or meiosis (discussed in [49]).…”
Section: Plos Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All living organisms have to face DNA damage, and particularly DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), 3 which are considered the most toxic DNA lesions for cells and have either exogenous or endogenous origins (1). Development of the adaptive immune system early in life is a major source of programmed DSBs (prDSB), which are introduced by recombination-acti-vating genes 1 and 2 (RAG1/2) during somatic DNA rearrangement (V(D)J recombination) of variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) elements of the T cell receptor and immunoglobulin genes in T and B cells in the thymus and bone marrow (BM), respectively (2,3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%