2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014gl059651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling dry deposition to vegetation phenology in the Community Earth System Model: Implications for the simulation of surface O3

Abstract: Dry deposition is an important removal process controlling surface ozone. We examine the representation of this ozone loss mechanism in the Community Earth System Model. We first correct the dry deposition parameterization by coupling the leaf and stomatal vegetation resistances to the leaf area index, an omission which has adversely impacted over a decade of ozone simulations using both the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers (MOZART) and Community Atmospheric Model‐Chem (CAM‐Chem) global models. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
142
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5. Correct parameterisation in models is critical to the determination of ozone budgets (Val-Martin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Role Of Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5. Correct parameterisation in models is critical to the determination of ozone budgets (Val-Martin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Role Of Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…isoprene - Archibald et al, 2010;Dunker et al, 2014;halogens -Yang et al, 2005;Saiz-Lopez et al, 2012a;and chemical mechanism -Saylor and Stein, 2012) and deposition (Val-Martin et al, 2014). For models to represent many of these processes, adequate resolution is required (Colette et al, 2014).…”
Section: Challenges In Modelling Ozonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOA formation is linked to the gas-phase chemistry through the oxidation of isoprene, monoterpenes, alkenes and toluene as in Lack et al (2004). Finally, dry deposition is represented by the multiple resistance approach of Wesely (1989), with some updates (Emmons et al, 2010;Lamarque et al, 2012;Val Martin et al, 2014). The calculation of dry deposition velocities is performed in CLM and linked to land cover types.…”
Section: Model Description and Future Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, large O 3 dry deposition velocities are associated with denser broadleaf forests (i.e., with high LAI) and crops (e.g., Wesely, 1989;Val Martin et al, 2014), whereas grasslands and needleleaf forests (i.e., with low LAI) are characterized by low deposition velocities. In our simulations, the O 3 dry deposition velocity generally shows a small decrease across the US (0.2-1.0 cm min −1 ; about 1-3 %) (Fig.…”
Section: Future Changes In Meteorological and Chemical Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The horizontal resolution is 0.5 • in latitude and longitude and it contains a monthly temporal resolution. Biogenic emissions are taken from Global Emissions InitiAtive (GEIA), fire emissions are based on a climatology derived from Global Fire Emissions Database version 2 (GFEDv2; van der Werf et al, 2006) until April 2010, when fire emissions change to global fire assimilation system (GFAS) emissions . Between January and October 2011 there has been a fire emission reading error in the model where, instead of adjusting emissions to the appropriate month, the same set of emissions have been read throughout this period.…”
Section: Emission Inventories and Assimilated Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%