2019
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling dynamics and evolutionary information with structure to identify protein regulatory and functional binding sites

Abstract: Binding sites in proteins can be either specifically functional binding sites (active sites) that bind specific substrates with high affinity or regulatory binding sites (allosteric sites), that modulate the activity of functional binding sites through effector molecules. Owing to their significance in determining protein function, the identification of protein functional and regulatory binding sites is widely acknowledged as an important biological problem. In this work, we present a novel binding site predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, for the classification of mild mutations and differentiation from the control group, co-evolutionary conservation has been shown to be the most important predictor, thereby suggesting that mild pathogenicity may be related to amino acid changes with small evolutionary substitution probability. However, to reach the elusive goal of establishing the precise relationship between ALPL mutation genotypes and HPP phenotypes and a more reliable prediction model or score, like as protein regulatory and functional binding sites prediction done, [80] more clinical data on mutations [81] and data on enzyme activity [13] are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, for the classification of mild mutations and differentiation from the control group, co-evolutionary conservation has been shown to be the most important predictor, thereby suggesting that mild pathogenicity may be related to amino acid changes with small evolutionary substitution probability. However, to reach the elusive goal of establishing the precise relationship between ALPL mutation genotypes and HPP phenotypes and a more reliable prediction model or score, like as protein regulatory and functional binding sites prediction done, [80] more clinical data on mutations [81] and data on enzyme activity [13] are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…143 A plethora of computational methodologies and tools have recently utilized the wealth of available structural data and the predictive power of machine learning, often in combination with the aforementioned techniques, for predicting putative allosteric sites, allosteric signaling pathways, allosteric hotspots, and cryptic sites. [144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] The allosteric database ASD v3.0 28 and the allosteric benchmark ASBench 157 have been extensively used for the training and testing of many developed tools for allosteric pocket detection. Tools such as Allosite 145 or Cryptosite 148 utilize pocket detection methods in conjunction with ASD to train machine learning algorithms e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, machine learning methods have been used to address a multitude of problems, some of which include, drug target discovery, gene function prediction, protein–protein interaction (PPI) prediction, protein structure and functional site prediction, and subcellular localization protein prediction [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. More recently, several machine learning and recommendation system methods have also been developed to predict the biological functions of mRNA isoforms [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%