In pressurized irrigation networks, energy reaches around 40% of the total water costs. Pump-as-Turbines (PATs) are a cost-effective technology for energy recovery, although they can present low efficiencies when operating outside of the best efficiency point (BEP). Flow fluctuations are very important in on-demand irrigation networks. This makes flow prediction and the selection of the optimal PAT more complex. In this research, an advanced statistical methodology was developed, which predicts the monthly flow fluctuations and the duration of each flow value. This was used to estimate the monthly time for which a PAT would work under BEP conditions and the time for which it would work with lower efficiencies. In addition, the optimal PAT power for each Excess Pressure Point (EPP) studied was determined following the strategy of minimising the PAT investment payback period (PP). The methodology was tested in Sector VII of the right bank of the Bembézar River (BMD), in Southern Spain. Five potential sites for PAT installation were found. The results showed a potential energy recovery of 93.9 MWh and an annual energy index per irrigated surface area of 0.10 MWh year −1 ha −1 . Renewable energy will become increasingly important in the agriculture sector, to reduce both water costs and the contribution to climate change. PATs represent an attractive technology that can help achieve such goals.2 of 20 points of excess pressure. Water networks are commonly sub-optimal in terms of their use of energy and water resources, due to changes in elevation, demand, water pressure and leakage rates across many kilometres of pipelines. Recent research has studied the application of MHP turbines in water supply and wastewater infrastructure to reduce pressure to desired levels and recover energy in the form of electricity [11][12][13][14]. In pressurized irrigation networks, the irrigation devices (drippers, sprinklers) continue to evolve towards greater efficiency in the consumption of water and energy. This results in a lower working pressure requirement in some areas of an irrigation network, triggering the potential for available energy recovery. In addition, due to changes in elevation and demand across a typical irrigation network, areas of excess pressure are unavoidable, unless a network is situated in an area with uniform gradient and demand distribution.The use of pump-as-turbines (PATs) for energy recovery have been shown to be cost-effectivepotentially just 10% of the cost of conventional MHP turbines [15][16][17][18][19] at sites with small power output capacity [20,21]. Nonetheless, PATs have the disadvantage of relatively low efficiency, which can reduce further with large flow fluctuations. It has been shown that the efficiency of the PAT can reduce to approximately 70% of the maximum efficiency when the flow is 20% below the Best Efficiency Point (BEP) flow rate [21]. Different investigations have also analysed the use of PATs in irrigation networks for energy recovery. Nonetheless, the flow fluctuations in the i...