2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2014.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling learning of complex interactions

Abstract: a b s t r a c tComplex applications such as big data analytics involve different forms of coupling relationships that reflect interactions between factors related to technical, business (domain-specific) and environmental (including socio-cultural and economic) aspects. There are diverse forms of couplings embedded in poor-structured and ill-structured data. Such couplings are ubiquitous, implicit and/or explicit, objective and/or subjective, heterogeneous and/or homogeneous, presenting complexities to existin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [26], an occurrence frequency-based method evaluates the distance between different values. Although these methods reveal distance information in some aspects, they do not capture the hierarchical coupling relationships [27], including the within and between attribute interactions and the interactions between attributes and labels, which fundamentally determine object distances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26], an occurrence frequency-based method evaluates the distance between different values. Although these methods reveal distance information in some aspects, they do not capture the hierarchical coupling relationships [27], including the within and between attribute interactions and the interactions between attributes and labels, which fundamentally determine object distances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hidden user-item interactions in Table D have not been explored in the relevant community, although they are very important for a deep understanding of how and why ratings are generated. The interactions in Table D are not as visible as those in other tables, but they incorporate implicit relations (which here we call coupling [6]) between a user attribute and an item property. (See more discussions in Section 6.5.…”
Section: Nature Of Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a non-IID recommendation perspective opens paradigm-shifting opportunities and new directions for next-generation foundational research and quality recommendation. In fact, learning non-IIDness [5,6] in big data is a foundational theoretical and practical challenge in data science and big data analytics [3,[13][14][15], which has not been paid much attention in relevant communities including computing, informatics, and statistics, because existing analytics and learning theories and systems have been mainly built on the IID assumption. The discussions about non-IID recommendation theories and systems in this work will hopefully inspire fundamental research and promising outcomes in other analytical, learning, and information-processing areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most current recommender systems are built on subjective feedback, e.g., ratings, to differentiate user preferences. However, subjective feedback is not always available, while objective feedback, e.g., click logs, is more easily obtained [Cao 2015]. The implicit preference data is often represented by binary values, that is, 1 for observed choices and 0 for others [Hu et al 2014;Pan et al 2008].…”
Section: Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%