2015
DOI: 10.1017/etds.2015.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling methods for random topological Markov chains

Abstract: Abstract. We apply coupling techniques in order to prove that the transfer operators associated with random topological Markov chains and non-stationary shift spaces with the big images and preimages-property have a spectral gap.Dezember 1, 2014.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has already been noticed that the 1-Wasserstein distance issued from optimal transportation theory is very convenient to prove exponential contraction properties for Markov chains (see e.g. [HM08,Sta13,Oll09]). In this article, we observe that this idea applies very effectively to the dynamics of expanding maps: indeed the dual transfer operator of an expanding map with respect to a normalized potential can be seen as a Markov chain, for which we prove exponential contraction.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has already been noticed that the 1-Wasserstein distance issued from optimal transportation theory is very convenient to prove exponential contraction properties for Markov chains (see e.g. [HM08,Sta13,Oll09]). In this article, we observe that this idea applies very effectively to the dynamics of expanding maps: indeed the dual transfer operator of an expanding map with respect to a normalized potential can be seen as a Markov chain, for which we prove exponential contraction.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the proof of [?, Lemma 7.2], the assumption on the integrability of log κ implies that the above limit is finite a.s., say n−1 k=0 r k κ(θ n−k ω) ≤ c ω . However, it is also pointed out in [32] that if κ is integrable, then we have an a.s. uniform upper bound, say C φ on n−1 k=0 r k κ(θ n−k ω). Given a Hölder function ψ, then we define…”
Section: Random Gibbs Measuresmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The article is structured as follows. In Section 2, we give the details with respect to the topology of H, introduce the Vaserstein metric and prove Theorem A by adaption of a result for non-stationary shift spaces in [10]. In Section 3, we consider stochastic cocycles and prove that dominated splittings for the induced action can be lifted.…”
Section: And Eithermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the estimate is well-known and therefore omitted (see, e.g. equation (3) in [10]). However, note that the estimate has various important consequences and implies, e.g., that L m…”
Section: Exponential Decay and Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%