Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.1997.620568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling observation/letter for a Markovian modelisation applied to the recognition of Arabic handwriting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second uses a more sophisticated explicit segmentation technique [12,13] to cut the words into more meaningful units or graphemes, which are larger than the frames. Our approach belongs to the second one.…”
Section: Application and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second uses a more sophisticated explicit segmentation technique [12,13] to cut the words into more meaningful units or graphemes, which are larger than the frames. Our approach belongs to the second one.…”
Section: Application and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the word recognition is based on the tree representation lexicon and the Viterbi algorithm. Miled et al [12] adopted an HMM model for Arabic words recognition using an explicit segmentation of words into graphemes. They used a K-NN classifier to assign to each grapheme an observation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El-Hajj [6] have used Neural Networks to combine three homogeneous HMM-based classifiers, which have different features as input, they used the IFN/ENIT database achieving a recognition rate of 94,44%. In [15], a strategy for Arabic handwritten word recognition has been proposed by Miled, the idea is based on a sequential hierarchical cooperation of three classifiers, all of a Markovian type. The first classifier is based on a global description of the word using sequential visual indices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the abstract, we compared the developed system to three other systems tested also on IFN/EINIT database; the ones of El-hajj [6], Miled [15] and Burrow [2], it may be noted from table 2 that the highest accuracy was obtained by El-Hajj, this is due to the use of a segmentation phase, on the other side our system achieves a good accuracy compared with Burrow's and Miled's system which prove the performance of combining an RBF and MLP with a Fuzzy ART network. …”
Section: Comparison With Other Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this level, each grapheme is represented by a vector of the different measurements used by the classifier to compare an unknown grapheme to known ones. The decision of the observation given to each grapheme is made using a k nearest neighbors classifier (k-NN) [16].…”
Section: Observations Vs Graphemesmentioning
confidence: 99%